Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making

被引:142
作者
Ren, Jingzheng [1 ]
Manzardo, Alessandro [1 ]
Mazzi, Anna [1 ]
Zuliani, Filippo [1 ]
Scipioni, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Ind Engn, CESQA Qual & Environm Res Ctr, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; Multicriteria decision-making; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Life cycle sustainability assessment; Social life cycle assessment; VIKOR; HYDROGEN ECONOMY; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEMS; SELECTION; LCA; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY; FRAMEWORK; EVALUATE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study objectives are twofold: (i) combining the life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework and the multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology for sustainability assessment and (ii) determining the most sustainable scenario for bioethanol production in China according to the preferences of the decision-makers/stakeholders. Life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (SLCA) are combined to collect the corresponding criteria data on environmental, economic, and social aspects, respectively. The study develops a novel SLCA method for quantifying the social criteria. The decision-makers/stakeholders can use linguistic terms to assess these criteria, and fuzzy theory is used to transform the linguistic variables into real numbers. Once the sustainability assessment criteria are determined, the study develops an MCDM method that combines the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the VIKOR method to prioritize the alternatives. The AHP is used to determine the criteria weights that are a prerequisite when using VIKOR; the VIKOR method is then used to determine the sustainability sequence of the scenarios. The study's proposed method investigates an illustrative case about three alternative bioethanol production scenarios (wheat-based, corn-based, and cassava-based): The prior sequence (based on the sustainability performances) in descending order is cassava-based, corn-based, and wheat-based. The proposed methodology results allow Chinese decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable scenario among many alternatives. The proposed methodology is generic, meaning that further alternatives can be studied and the most sustainable option can be ultimately determined. The main study contribution is to test the combination of an MCDM methodology and LCSA for sustainability decision-making by studying three alternative pathways for bioethanol production in China. The proposed method feasibly enables the decision-makers/stakeholders to find the most sustainable scenario to achieve their objectives among various alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 853
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system [J].
Amindoust, Atefeh ;
Ahmed, Shamsuddin ;
Saghafinia, Ali ;
Bahreininejad, Ardeshir .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2012, 12 (06) :1668-1677
[2]  
[Anonymous], LIF CYCL SUST ASS
[3]   Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies [J].
Aparcana, Sandra ;
Salhofer, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05) :1116-1128
[4]   Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project's total cost and multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods [J].
Bachmann, Till M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (09) :1698-1709
[5]   Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: Application of modified VIKOR method [J].
Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani ;
Osanloo, Morteza ;
Karimi, Behrooz .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (03) :2550-2556
[6]   The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! [J].
Benoit, Catherine ;
Norris, Gregory A. ;
Valdivia, Sonia ;
Ciroth, Andreas ;
Moberg, Asa ;
Bos, Ulrike ;
Prakash, Siddharth ;
Ugaya, Cassia ;
Beck, Tabea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (02) :156-163
[7]   Multi Criteria Analysis for bioenergy systems assessments [J].
Buchholz, Thomas ;
Rametsteiner, Ewald ;
Volk, Timothy A. ;
Luzadis, Valerie A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) :484-495
[8]   Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective [J].
Buonocore, Elvira ;
Franzese, Pier Paolo ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) :69-78
[10]   Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies [J].
Cavallaro, Fausto .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (07) :1678-1685