Effects of ai-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma miss rate/adenoma detection rate: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:6
作者
Shao, Lei [1 ]
Yan, Xinzong [2 ]
Liu, Chengjiang [3 ]
Guo, Can [1 ]
Cai, Baojia [1 ]
机构
[1] Qinghai Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Univ, Basic Lab, Med Coll, Xining, Qinghai, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, He Fei, Peoples R China
关键词
adenoma detection rate; adenoma missed rate; artificial intelligence; colonoscopy; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000031945
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Colonoscopy can detect colorectal adenomas and reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer, but there are still many missing diagnoses. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) can effectively reduce the rate of missed diagnosis and improve the detection rate of adenoma, but its clinical application is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the adenoma missed detection rate (AMR) and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) by artificial colonoscopy. Methods: Conduct a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Medline database, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis followed the direction of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis. The random effect model was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 articles were eventually included in the study. Computer aided detection (CADe) significantly decreased AMR compared with the control group (137/1039, 13.2% vs 304/1054, 28.8%; OR,0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.59; P < .05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference in ADR between the CADe group and control group, respectively (1835/5041, 36.4% vs 1309/4553, 28.7%; OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71; P < .05). The advanced adenomas missed rate and detection rate in CADe group was not statistically significant when compared with the control group. Conclusions: AIAC can effectively reduce AMR and improve ADR, especially small adenomas. Therefore, this method is worthy of clinical application. However, due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more in-depth studies are needed in the field of AIAC in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] How to obtain the P value from a confidence interval
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Bland, J. Martin
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [2] The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate
    Aniwan, Satimai
    Orkoonsawat, Piyachai
    Viriyautsahakul, Vichai
    Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep
    Pittayanon, Rapat
    Wisedopas, Naruemon
    Sumdin, Sakolkun
    Ponuthai, Yuwadee
    Wiangngoen, Sumitra
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (05) : 723 - 729
  • [3] Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial)
    Brown, Jeremy R. Glissen
    Mansour, Nabil M.
    Wang, Pu
    Chuchuca, Maria Aguilera
    Minchenberg, Scott B.
    Chandnani, Madhuri
    Liu, Lin
    Gross, Seth A.
    Sengupta, Neil
    Berzin, Tyler M.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (07) : 1499 - +
  • [4] Factors associated with colorectal cancer occurrence after colonoscopy that did not diagnose colorectal cancer
    Cheung, Danny
    Evison, Felicity
    Patel, Prashant
    Trudgill, Nigel
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 84 (02) : 287 - +
  • [5] Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P1298, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
  • [6] Colorectal cancer
    Dekker, Evelien
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Vleugels, Jasper L. A.
    Kasi, Pashtoon M.
    Wallace, Michael B.
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 394 (10207) : 1467 - 1480
  • [7] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy
    Hann, Alexander
    Meining, Alexander
    [J]. VISCERAL MEDICINE, 2021, : 471 - 475
  • [9] Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hassan, Cesare
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Iannone, Andrea
    Maselli, Roberta
    Jovani, Manol
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Antonelli, Giulio
    Yu, Honggang
    Areia, Miguel
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Sharma, Prateek
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Roesch, Thomas
    Wallace, Michael
    Repici, Alessandro
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 77 - +
  • [10] Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Kamba, Shunsuke
    Tamai, Naoto
    Saitoh, Iduru
    Matsui, Hiroaki
    Horiuchi, Hideka
    Kobayashi, Masakuni
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Ego, Mai
    Fukuda, Akihiro
    Tonouchi, Aya
    Shimahara, Yuki
    Nishikawa, Masako
    Nishino, Haruo
    Saito, Yutaka
    Sumiyama, Kazuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 56 (08) : 746 - 757