Inhibition-related Activation in the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus in the Absence of Inhibitory Cues

被引:95
作者
Lenartowicz, Agatha [1 ]
Verbruggen, Frederick [2 ]
Logan, Gordon D. [4 ]
Poldrack, Russell A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Semel Inst Neurosci & Human Behav, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QJ, Devon, England
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STOP-SIGNAL INHIBITION; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; GO/NO-GO TASK; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; COGNITIVE CONTROL; UNCONSCIOUS ACTIVATION; TARGET DETECTION; FUNCTIONAL MRI; WORKING-MEMORY;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_00031
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) has been hypothesized to mediate response inhibition. Typically response inhibition is signaled by an external stop cue, which provides a top-down signal to initiate the process. However, recent behavioral findings suggest that response inhibition can also be triggered automatically by bottom-up processes. In the present study, we evaluated whether rIFG activity would also be observed during automatic inhibition, in which no stop cue was presented and no motor inhibition was actually required. We measured rIFG activation in response to stimuli that were previously associated with stop signals but which required a response on the current trial (reversal trials). The results revealed an increase in rIFG (pars triangularis) activity, suggesting that it can be activated by associations between stimuli and stopping. Moreover, its role in inhibition tasks is not contingent on the presence of an external stop cue. We conclude that rIFG involvement in stopping is consistent with a role in reprogramming of action plans, which may comprise inhibition, and its activity can be triggered through automatic, bottom-up processing.
引用
收藏
页码:3388 / 3399
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control [J].
Aron, Adam R. .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2007, 13 (03) :214-228
[2]   Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus [J].
Aron, AR ;
Poldrack, RA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (09) :2424-2433
[3]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[4]   Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Logan, GD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2003, 112 (02) :105-142
[5]   General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Jenkinson, M ;
Smith, SM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (02) :1052-1063
[6]   Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Smith, SA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (02) :137-152
[7]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[8]   The ecological validity of tests of executive function [J].
Burgess, PW ;
Alderman, N ;
Evans, J ;
Emslie, H ;
Wilson, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 4 (06) :547-558
[9]   Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe [J].
Chambers, CD ;
Bellgrove, MA ;
Stokes, MG ;
Henderson, TR ;
Garavan, H ;
Robertson, IH ;
Morris, AP ;
Mattingley, JB .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (03) :444-455
[10]  
Chikazoe J, 2008, NEUROSCI RES, V61, pS65