Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system

被引:30
作者
Jang, Hyeon-Ki [1 ,2 ]
Song, Beomjong [3 ]
Hwang, Gue-Ho [1 ,2 ]
Bae, Sangsu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Chem, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Convergence Basic Sci, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] Univ Tokyo, Int Res Ctr Neurointelligence WPI IRCN, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
HOMOLOGY-DIRECTED REPAIR; PLURIPOTENT STEM-CELLS; MUSCULAR-DYSTROPHY; GENOMIC DNA; MOUSE MODEL; BASE; MUTATION; EFFICIENT; HEMOPHILIA; DONOR;
D O I
10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The CRISPR-Cas system has undoubtedly revolutionized the genome editing field, enabling targeted gene disruption, regulation, and recovery in a guide RNA-specific manner. In this review, we focus on currently available gene recovery strategies that use CRISPR nucleases, particularly for the treatment of genetic disorders. Through the action of DNA repair mechanisms, CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage at a genomic target can shift the reading frame to correct abnormal frameshifts, whereas DNA cleavage at two sites, which can induce large deletions or inversions, can correct structural abnormalities in DNA. Homology-mediated or homology-independent gene recovery strategies that require donor DNAs have been developed and widely applied to precisely correct mutated sequences in genes of interest. In contrast to the DNA cleavage-mediated gene correction methods listed above, base-editing tools enable base conversion in the absence of donor DNAs. In addition, CRISPR-associated transposases have been harnessed to generate a targeted knockin, and prime editors have been developed to edit tens of nucleotides in cells. Here, we introduce currently developed gene recovery strategies and discuss the pros and cons of each. Experimental & Molecular Medicine: Genetic disease: Gene editing for recovery The CRISPR-Cas gene editing system, which relies on small RNA molecules to guide a gene-editing enzyme to specific locations on DNA, is being developed as an effective tool for correcting genetic disorders. Researchers in South Korea led by Sangsu Bae at Hanyang University in South Korea, review recent progress towards such "gene recovery" procedures. The possibilities range from correcting mutations at the level of a single base in the base sequence of DNA, to deleting, inverting or inserting large sections of DNA to correct major structural abnormalities. The authors discuss the pros and cons of different procedures, including CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, and prime editors. They expect current laboratory animal investigations will lead to a new era in human genetic medicine, yielding treatments for genetic diseases that cannot currently be treated with drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1027
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
[31]   Adenine base editors catalyze cytosine conversions in human cells [J].
Kim, Heon Seok ;
Jeong, You Kyeong ;
Hur, Junho K. ;
Kim, Jin-Soo ;
Bae, Sangsu .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (10) :1145-+
[32]   SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning-based model with high generalization performance [J].
Kim, Hui Kwon ;
Kim, Younggwang ;
Lee, Sungtae ;
Min, Seonwoo ;
Bae, Jung Yoon ;
Choi, Jae Woo ;
Park, Jinman ;
Jung, Dongmin ;
Yoon, Sungroh ;
Kim, Hyongbum Henry .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (11)
[33]   Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity [J].
Kim, Hui Kwon ;
Min, Seonwoo ;
Song, Myungjae ;
Jung, Soobin ;
Choi, Jae Woo ;
Kim, Younggwang ;
Lee, Sangeun ;
Yoon, Sungroh ;
Kim, Hyongbum .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (03) :239-+
[34]   Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions [J].
Kim, Y. Bill ;
Komor, Alexis C. ;
Levy, Jonathan M. ;
Packer, Michael S. ;
Zhao, Kevin T. ;
Liu, David R. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04) :371-+
[35]   Hybrid restriction enzymes: Zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain [J].
Kim, YG ;
Cha, J ;
Chandrasegaran, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (03) :1156-1160
[36]   Transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration [J].
Klompe, Sanne E. ;
Vo, Phuc L. H. ;
Halpin-Healy, Tyler S. ;
Sternberg, Samuel H. .
NATURE, 2019, 571 (7764) :219-+
[37]   Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction [J].
Koblan, Luke W. ;
Doman, Jordan L. ;
Wilson, Christopher ;
Levy, Jonathan M. ;
Tay, Tristan ;
Newby, Gregory A. ;
Maianti, Juan Pablo ;
Raguram, Aditya ;
Liu, David R. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) :843-+
[38]   Cut and Paste: Efficient Homology-Directed Repair of a Dominant Negative KRT14 Mutation via CRISPR/Cas9 Nickases [J].
Kocher, Thomas ;
Peking, Patricia ;
Klausegger, Alfred ;
Murauer, Eva Maria ;
Hofbauer, Josefina Pinon ;
Wally, Verena ;
Lettner, Thomas ;
Hainzl, Stefan ;
Ablinger, Michael ;
Bauer, Johann Wolfgang ;
Reichelt, Julia ;
Koller, Ulrich .
MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2017, 25 (11) :2585-2598
[39]   Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T: A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity [J].
Komor, Alexis C. ;
Zhao, Kevin T. ;
Packer, Michael S. ;
Gaudelli, Nicole M. ;
Waterbury, Amanda L. ;
Koblan, Luke W. ;
Kim, Y. Bill ;
Badran, Ahmed H. ;
Liu, David R. .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (08)
[40]   Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage [J].
Komor, Alexis C. ;
Kim, Yongjoo B. ;
Packer, Michael S. ;
Zuris, John A. ;
Liu, David R. .
NATURE, 2016, 533 (7603) :420-+