Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia

被引:11
作者
Woollacott, Ione [1 ]
Morgan, George [2 ]
Chowdary, Pratima [3 ]
O'Hara, Jamie [2 ,4 ]
Franks, Bethany [2 ]
van Overbeeke, Eline [5 ]
Dunn, Nicola
Michelsen, Sissel [6 ]
Huys, Isabelle [6 ]
Martin, Antony [2 ]
Cawson, Matthew [2 ]
Brownrigg, Jack [1 ]
Winburn, Ian [1 ]
Thomson, Jim [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, England
[2] HCD Econ, Daresbury WA4 4FS, England
[3] Royal Free Hosp, Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, London, England
[4] Univ Chester, Fac Hlth & Social Care, Chester, Cheshire, England
[5] Pfizer NV SA, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
discrete choice experiment; haemophilia; gene therapies; preferences; qualitative research; treatment attributes; PHARMACISTS PREFERENCES; HEALTH; PHYSICIANS; INHIBITORS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/hae.14572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction With the development of gene therapy for people with haemophilia (PWH), it is important to understand how people impacted by haemophilia (PIH) and clinicians prioritise haemophilia treatment attributes to support informed treatment decisions. Objective To examine the treatment attribute preferences of PIH and clinical experts in the United Kingdom (UK) and to develop a profile of gene therapy characteristics fit for use in future discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with PIH (n = 14) and clinical experts (n = 6) who ranked pre-defined treatment attributes by importance. Framework analysis was conducted to identify key themes and treatment attributes; points were allocated based on the rankings. Synthesis of results by a multidisciplinary group informed development of a profile of gene therapy characteristics for use in future research. Results Key themes identified by PIH and clinical experts included patient relevant features and the importance of 'informed decision making'. The six top-ranked treatment attributes were 'effect on factor level' (79 points), 'uncertainty regarding long-term risks' (57 points), 'impact on daily life' (41 points), 'frequency of monitoring' (33 points), 'impact on ability to participate in physical activity' (29 points), and 'uncertainty regarding long-term benefits' (28 points). The final treatment characteristics were categorised as therapeutic option, treatment effectiveness, safety concerns, impact on self-management and quality of life (role limitations). Conclusion We identified several gene therapy characteristics important to PIH and clinicians in the UK. These characteristics will be used in a future DCE to further investigate patient preferences for gene therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 609
页数:22
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Patient and parent preferences for characteristics of prophylactic treatment in hemophilia [J].
Furlan, Roberto ;
Krishnan, Sangeeta ;
Vietri, Jeffrey .
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2015, 9 :1687-1694
[12]   Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research [J].
Gale, Nicola K. ;
Heath, Gemma ;
Cameron, Elaine ;
Rashid, Sabina ;
Redwood, Sabi .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[13]  
Hauber AB, 2016, VALUE HEALTH, V19, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004
[14]   A Framework for Incorporating Patient Preferences Regarding Benefits and Risks into Regulatory Assessment of Medical Technologies [J].
Ho, Martin ;
Saha, Anindita ;
McCleary, K. Kimberly ;
Levitan, Bennett ;
Christopher, Stephanie ;
Zandlo, Kristen ;
Braithwaite, R. Scott ;
Hauber, A. Brett .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) :746-750
[15]   TAKING PATIENT HETEROGENEITY AND PREFERENCES INTO ACCOUNT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS [J].
Kievit, Wietske ;
Tummers, Marcia ;
van Hoorn, Ralph ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Mozygemba, Kati ;
Refolo, Pietro ;
Sacchini, Dario ;
Pfadenhauer, Lisa ;
Gerhardus, Ansgar ;
van der Wilt, Gert Jan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (05) :562-569
[16]   Increasing Patient Involvement in Drug Development [J].
Lowe, Maria M. ;
Blaser, David A. ;
Cone, Lisa ;
Arcona, Steve ;
Ko, John ;
Sasane, Rahul ;
Wicks, Paul .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) :869-878
[17]   Differences between patients', physicians' and pharmacists' preferences for treatment products in haemophilia: a discrete choice experiment [J].
Mantovani, LG ;
Monzini, MS ;
Mannucci, PM ;
Scalone, L ;
Villa, M ;
Gringeri, A .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2005, 11 (06) :589-597
[18]   The cost of severe haemophilia in Europe: the CHESS study [J].
O'Hara, Jamie ;
Hughes, David ;
Camp, Charlotte ;
Burke, Tom ;
Carroll, Liz ;
Diego, Daniel-Anibal Garcia .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2017, 12
[19]   Health-related quality of life assessment in haemophilia patients on prophylaxis therapy: a systematic review of results from prospective clinical trials [J].
Oladapo, A. O. ;
Epstein, J. D. ;
Williams, E. ;
Ito, D. ;
Gringeri, A. ;
Valentino, L. A. .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2015, 21 (05) :E344-E358
[20]   Real-life experience in switching to new extended half-life products at European haemophilia centres [J].
Peyvandi, Flora ;
Garagiola, Isabella ;
Boscarino, Marco ;
Ryan, Aislin ;
Hermans, Cedric ;
Makris, Michael .
HAEMOPHILIA, 2019, 25 (06) :946-952