Groundwater Level Modeling with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:74
作者
Ahmadi, Arman [1 ]
Olyaei, Mohammadali [2 ,3 ]
Heydari, Zahra [4 ]
Emami, Mohammad [1 ,5 ]
Zeynolabedin, Amin [2 ]
Ghomlaghi, Arash [2 ]
Daccache, Andre [1 ]
Fogg, Graham E. [6 ,7 ]
Sadegh, Mojtaba [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran 1417935840, Iran
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Civil Environm & Geoengn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Semnan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Water Engn & Hydraul Struct, Semnan 3513119111, Iran
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Hydrol Sci Grad Grp, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] Boise State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Boise, ID 83706 USA
关键词
groundwater hydrology; water resources; data science; regression machine learning; hydrogeology; artificial neural networks; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION; FLOW; PREDICTION; DEPLETION; HYBRID; FLUCTUATIONS; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.3390/w14060949
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater is a vital source of freshwater, supporting the livelihood of over two billion people worldwide. The quantitative assessment of groundwater resources is critical for sustainable management of this strained resource, particularly as climate warming, population growth, and socioeconomic development further press the water resources. Rapid growth in the availability of a plethora of in-situ and remotely sensed data alongside advancements in data-driven methods and machine learning offer immense opportunities for an improved assessment of groundwater resources at the local to global levels. This systematic review documents the advancements in this field and evaluates the accuracy of various models, following the protocol developed by the Center for Evidence-Based Conservation. A total of 197 original peer-reviewed articles from 2010-2020 and from 28 countries that employ regression machine learning algorithms for groundwater monitoring or prediction are analyzed and their results are aggregated through a meta-analysis. Our analysis points to the capability of machine learning models to monitor/predict different characteristics of groundwater resources effectively and efficiently. Modeling the groundwater level is the most popular application of machine learning models, and the groundwater level in previous time steps is the most employed input data. The feed-forward artificial neural network is the most employed and accurate model, although the model performance does not exhibit a striking dependence on the model choice, but rather the information content of the input variables. Around 10-12 years of data are required to develop an acceptable machine learning model with a monthly temporal resolution. Finally, advances in machine and deep learning algorithms and computational advancements to merge them with physics-based models offer unprecedented opportunities to employ new information, e.g., InSAR data, for increased spatiotemporal resolution and accuracy of groundwater monitoring and prediction.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Monitoring Groundwater Storage Depletion Using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Data in Bakhtegan Catchment, Iran [J].
Abou Zaki, Nizar ;
Haghighi, Ali Torabi ;
Rossi, Pekka M. ;
Tourian, Mohammad J. ;
Klove, Bjorn .
WATER, 2019, 11 (07)
[2]   A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting [J].
Adamowski, Jan ;
Chan, Hiu Fung .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 407 (1-4) :28-40
[3]   Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World [J].
AghaKouchak, Amir ;
Chiang, Felicia ;
Huning, Laurie S. ;
Love, Charlotte A. ;
Mallakpour, Iman ;
Mazdiyasni, Omid ;
Moftakhari, Hamed ;
Papalexiou, Simon Michael ;
Ragno, Elisa ;
Sadegh, Mojtaba .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, VOL 48, 2020, 2020, 48 :519-548
[4]   Soil Properties Prediction for Precision Agriculture Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Ahmadi, Arman ;
Emami, Mohammad ;
Daccache, Andre ;
He, Liuyue .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (03)
[5]   Do direct and inverse uncertainty assessment methods present the same results? [J].
Ahmadi, Arman ;
Nasseri, Mohsen .
JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2020, 22 (04) :842-855
[6]   Parametric uncertainty assessment of hydrological models: coupling UNEEC-P and a fuzzy general regression neural network [J].
Ahmadi, Arman ;
Nasseri, Mohsen ;
Solomatine, Dimitri P. .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2019, 64 (09) :1080-1094
[7]  
Alagha JS, 2017, HYDROGEOL J, V25, P2347, DOI 10.1007/s10040-017-1658-1
[8]   Hydrology - Flow and storage in groundwater systems [J].
Alley, WM ;
Healy, RW ;
LaBaugh, JW ;
Reilly, TE .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5575) :1985-1990
[9]   Integrated preprocessing techniques with linear stochastic approaches in groundwater level forecasting [J].
Azari, Arash ;
Zeynoddin, Mohammad ;
Ebtehaj, Isa ;
Sattar, Ahmed M. A. ;
Gharabaghi, Bahram ;
Bonakdari, Hossein .
ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2021, 69 (04) :1395-1411
[10]   Artificial neural network model as a potential alternative for groundwater salinity forecasting [J].
Banerjee, Pallavi ;
Singh, V. S. ;
Chatttopadhyay, Kausik ;
Chandra, P. C. ;
Singh, Bhoop .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 398 (3-4) :212-220