Conjunctival rotation autograft for pterygium - An alternative to conjunctival autografting

被引:44
|
作者
Jap, A [1 ]
Chan, C [1 ]
Lim, L [1 ]
Tan, DTH [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore 168751, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90006-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of conjunctival rotation autografting (CRA) as an alternative to conventional conjunctival autograft after pterygium excision. Design: Prospective noncomparative case series. Participants: Consecutive patients seen at the Pterygium Clinic of the Singapore National Eye Centre who were thought to be unsuitable for conventional conjunctival autografting underwent a modified surgical procedure, which the authors describe as CRA. There were 51 rotation autografts performed on 45 eyes of 43 patients. Intervention: In this procedure, the underlying fibrovascular pterygium tissue was removed and the original epithelium (with minimal subepithelial tissue included) replaced over the bare sclera with a 180 degrees rotation. Surgeries were performed by one surgeon (DT) from April 1995 to May 1996. Main Outcome Measure: Pterygium recurrence and complications of CRA were measured. Results: The mean follow-up time was 12 months (range, 2-22 months). There were 46 primary and 5 recurrent pterygia. The indications for CRA were combined cataract and pterygium surgery (39.2%), double pterygia (31.4%), the need to preserve the superior conjunctiva (21.6%), and superior conjunctival scarring (7.8%). There were two recurrences (4% recurrence rate), one occurring at 4 months and the other occurring at 7 months after surgery. No significant complications were encountered. However, 50% of the grafts remained mildly injected for more than 3 months, and some remained injected for up to 13 months after surgery (average of 4 months). Pigmentary changes were also noted in six grafts (12%). Conclusion: Conjunctival rotation autografting is a useful technique of conjunctival grafting in cases in which it rs not possible or desirable to use the superior conjunctiva as a donor source.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 71
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conjunctival Rotation Autograft for Pterygium: An Alternative to Conventional Conjunctival Autografting
    Sune, Mona P.
    Sune, Pradeep G.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 2 (04): : 227 - 231
  • [2] Letter to the Editor Regarding "Conjunctival Rotation Autograft: An Alternative to Conventional Conjunctival Autografting''
    Jhanji, Vishal
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 2 (05): : 349 - 349
  • [3] Pterygium surgery: Conjunctival rotation autograft versus conjunctival autograft
    Dadeya, S
    Malik, KPS
    Gulliani, BP
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY AND LASERS, 2002, 33 (04): : 269 - 274
  • [4] Conjunctival rotation autograft for primary pterygium
    Alp, BN
    Yanyali, A
    Ay, GM
    Keskin, O
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2002, 216 (05) : 333 - 336
  • [5] Conjunctival autograft for pterygium
    Clearfield, Elizabeth
    Muthappan, Valliammai
    Wang, Xue
    Kuo, Irene C.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (02):
  • [6] Comparison of Anchored Conjunctival Rotation Flap and Conjunctival Autograft Techniques in Pterygium Surgery
    Gokce, Gokcen
    Ozge, Gokhan
    Mumcuoglu, Tarkan
    Kucukevcilioglu, Murat
    Ayyildiz, Onder
    Ozgonul, Cem
    CORNEA, 2015, 34 (05) : E13 - E13
  • [7] A Comparison of Anchored Conjunctival Rotation Flap and Conjunctival Autograft Techniques in Pterygium Surgery
    Kim, Sung Hyun
    Oh, Jong-Hyun
    Do, Jae Rock
    Chuck, Roy S.
    Park, Choul Yong
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (12) : 1578 - 1581
  • [8] Excision of pterygium and conjunctival autograft
    Varssano, D
    Michaeli-Cohen, A
    Loewenstein, A
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 4 (12): : 1097 - 1100
  • [10] Concomitant use of conjunctival tissue graft from the pterygium itself without rotation in pterygium surgery: A full circle in conjunctival autografting
    Kodavoor, Shreesha Kumar
    Tiwari, Nitin Narendra
    Ramamurthy, Dandapani
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 66 (04) : 506 - 510