Analysis of Sexual Dimorphism of Craniofacial Traits Using Geometric Morphometric Techniques

被引:71
作者
Gonzalez, P. N. [1 ]
Bernal, V. [1 ]
Perez, S. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl La Plata, Museo La Plata, Fac Ciencias Nat & Museo, Div Antropol, RA-1900 La Plata, Argentina
关键词
cranial sex; semilandmarks; discriminant analysis; k-means clustering; MEASUREMENT ERROR; GREAT APES; MORPHOLOGY; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1002/oa.1109
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This work deals with the assessment of cranial sexual dimorphism in human skeletal samples applying geometric morphometric techniques. The purpose of this research is to apply such techniques to quantitatively describe in craniofacial traits the degree and pattern of shape and size sexual dimorphism. Likewise, we evaluate the precision and accuracy of semilandmark-based techniques for sex estimation. We employ a sample of 125 adult skulls of known sex from the Coimbra collection. A set of coordinate points was selected to describe glabella, mastoid, frontal and zygomatic processes. The results of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) show excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement (ICC > 0.96) in the location of the coordinates of points employed. The principal component analysis (PCA) performed on shape variables shows a large superposition of both sexes, suggesting a relatively low degree of dimorphism in shape. As a consequence, the average percentages of correct sex estimations based on these variables were of 60.12 and 68.90%, obtained by discriminant analysis with leave-one-out cross validation and k-means clustering respectively. Conversely, when centroid size is included in PCA, females and males exhibit large separation along the first component. The highest values of correct assignment (77.86 and 72.15%) were found using shape-size variables with discriminant and k-means clustering analysis, indicating that the traits analysed display marked sex differences related to the larger size and more robust features of males. Finally, the advantages of geometric morphometric techniques are discussed. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution' [J].
Adams, DC ;
Rohlf, FJ ;
Slice, DE .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2004, 71 (01) :5-16
[2]  
[Anonymous], MONOGRAFIAS MUSEO NA
[3]  
Arnqvist G, 1998, ACTA ZOOL ACAD SCI H, V44, P73
[4]  
Bookstein F L, 1997, Med Image Anal, V1, P225
[5]  
Bookstein F. L., 1991, MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS L
[6]  
Buikstra J., 1994, Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas archaeological survey report number 44: Arkansas: Fayetteville, V44, DOI DOI 10.1002/AJHB.1310070519
[7]  
Corner BD., 1992, J Quant Anthropol, V3, P347
[8]  
D'Agostino RB, 1998, ENCY BIOSTATISTICS, V4, P2843
[9]  
Paiva Luiz Airton Saavedra de, 2003, Rev. Hosp. Clin., V58, P15
[10]   EQUIVALENCE OF WEIGHTED KAPPA AND INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS MEASURES OF RELIABILITY [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 33 (03) :613-619