Dental cone beam CT: An updated review

被引：100

作者：

Kaasalainen, Touko ^{[1
,2
]}

Ekholm, Marja ^{[3
,4
]}

Siiskonen, Teemu ^{[5
]}

Kortesniemi, Mika ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Helsinki, HUS Diagnost Ctr Radiol, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00290, Finland

[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00290, Finland

[3] Univ Turku, Inst Dent, Lemminkaisenkatu 2, Turku 20520, Finland

[4] Turku Univ Hosp, South West Finland Imaging Ctr, Lemminkaisenkatu 2, Turku 20520, Finland

[5] Radiat & Nucl Safety Author STUK, Radiat Practices Regulat, POB 14, FI-00881 Helsinki, Finland

来源：

PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2021年 / 88卷

关键词：

Dental; CBCT; Characteristics; Dosimetry; Image quality; Guidelines; Development; Cone beam CT; Imaging; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION METHODS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; POSITION STATEMENT; AMERICAN ACADEMY; MAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; GUIDELINES; ARTIFACTS; CBCT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a diverse 3D x-ray imaging technique that has gained significant popularity in dental radiology in the last two decades. CBCT overcomes the limitations of traditional twodimensional dental imaging and enables accurate depiction of multiplanar details of maxillofacial bony structures and surrounding soft tissues. In this review article, we provide an updated status on dental CBCT imaging and summarise the technical features of currently used CBCT scanner models, extending to recent developments in scanner technology, clinical aspects, and regulatory perspectives on dose optimisation, dosimetry, and diagnostic reference levels. We also consider the outlook of potential techniques along with issues that should be resolved in providing clinically more effective CBCT examinations that are optimised for the benefit of the patient.

引用

页码：193 / 217

页数：25

共 94 条

[1]

Adibi S, 2012, J DENT EDUC, V76, P1437

[2]

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), 2017, PP26B AAPM

[3]

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), 2019, PP32A AAPM

[4]

[Anonymous], STUKS DECISION STUK