A System Model for Total Dissolved Gas Risk Assessment Due to Multidam Spill Operations

被引:2
作者
Kamal, Rajib [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, David Z. [1 ]
Crossman, James A. [3 ]
Leake, Alf [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
[2] SRK Consulting Canada Inc, 1066 West Hastings St, Vancouver, BC V6E 3X2, Canada
[3] BC Hydro & Power Author, Dept Environm, 601 18th St, Castlegar, BC V1N 2N1, Canada
[4] BC Hydro & Power Author, Dept Environm, 6911 Southpoint Dr, Burnaby, BC V3N 4X8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
SUPERSATURATION; PREDICTION; DOWNSTREAM; REAERATION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001487
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spill operations of hydropower facilities can generate supersaturated total dissolved gases (TDGs) that can negatively impact fish residing in downstream habitats by causing gas bubble disease and mortality. Assessment of such impact and management of TDG can be challenging, particularly in river systems with multiple dams, because this requires investigation of complex physical processes related to gas transfer and dissolved gas generation in spillways as well as its transport, mixing, and dissipation in the riverine environment. In this study, an integrated analytical platform was developed to model system-wide total dissolved gas levels during spill events. To test its functionality, TDG monitoring data from the lower Columbia River hydropower system was evaluated for different operational conditions. The system includes contributions from the dams on two other regulated tributaries. In addition to facility-specific estimates of TDG production, the system model provided TDG distribution in the river system, which provides rapid and accurate estimations for impact assessment or mitigation. A ranking process was developed to address cumulative TDG risk for multifacility spill operations. This involved estimation of risk scores considering severity of supersaturation level, river depth compensation, and exposure duration for a given spill event, and grouping the scores into four risk categories defined as none, low, moderate, and high. This resulted in a risk assessment framework that identifies the potential risk zones and the degree and extent of fish habitat impacted for the combined facility operations in a complex river system. This framework can be used as a tool to help inform water management decisions for regulatory compliance and environmental performance, and provide a strategic assessment of the relative need for mitigation action. (c) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The impacts of "run-of-river' hydropower on the physical and ecological condition of rivers [J].
Anderson, David ;
Moggridge, Helen ;
Warren, Philip ;
Shucksmith, James .
WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 29 (02) :268-276
[2]  
Antcliffe B.L., 2002, EFFECT DISSOLVED GAS
[3]  
Azbel D., 1981, 2 PHASE FLOWS CHEM E
[4]  
BC Hydro, 2014, TOT DISS GAS MAN STR
[5]  
BCMOE (BC Ministry of Environment Lands and Parks), 1997, WATER QUALITY CRITER
[6]  
Bruce J.A., 2016, CAQ017
[7]  
CCME, 1999, CAN ENV QUAL GUID
[8]   Assessing the cumulative environmental impact of hydropower construction on river systems based on energy network model [J].
Chen, Shaoqing ;
Chen, Bin ;
Fath, Brian D. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :78-92
[9]  
Colt J, 2012, ELSEV INSIGHT, P1
[10]   Ecological Optimal Operation of Hydropower Stations to Maximize Total Phosphorus Export [J].
Deng, Jiahui ;
Li, Yu ;
Xu, Bo ;
Ding, Wei ;
Zhou, Huicheng ;
Schmidt, Arthur .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (09)