Investigation of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with charged aerosol detector for the analysis of tromethamine

被引:4
|
作者
Beck, Taslyne Imame Hassane [1 ]
Toussaint, Balthazar [1 ,2 ]
Surget, Estelle [1 ]
Herrenknecht, Christine [3 ]
Boudy, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
Jaccoulet, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Agence Gen Equipements & Prod Sante, AP HP, Dept Rech & Dev Pharmaceut DRDP, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris, CNRS, INSERM, Unite Technol Chim & Biol Sante,Fac Pharm, Paris, France
[3] Univ Nantes, Lab Mer, Sante MMS EA 2160, Mol, B-44322 Nantes, Belgium
关键词
Charged aerosol detector; HILIC stationary Phases; FIA; Validation; Tromethamine; STABILITY-INDICATING METHOD; REVERSED-PHASE; TRIS(HYDROXYMETHYL)AMINOMETHANE TROMETHAMINE; PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; RETENTION; HPLC; ION; IMPURITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123050
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Tromethamine (TMM), often encountered in a final drug product, exhibits interesting chemical properties as a counter ion, buffer, or active ingredient. European and US pharmacopeias propose titration against hydrogen chloride for TMM assays. However, this method can be a hindrance when using drugs containing low concentrations of TMM in complex buffered formulations. Due to the lack of chromophores and the high hydrophilicity of TMM, we performed a simple and reliable hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled with a charged aerosol detector (HILIC-CAD) separation approach as an alternative for TMM analysis. An amide stationary phase and a mobile phase consisting of a binary mixture of acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium formate, pH 3 (80/20, V/V) were used. As the CAD response deeply depends on parameters such as stationary phases and pH buffer, we investigated their impact and explored the optimal signal conditions. Including TMM analogs such as tris (hydroxymethyl) nitromethane and 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol allowed us to select these parameters appropriately. The effects of the evaporation temperature, flow rate, and power function value (PFV) on the CAD signal response were also studied and optimized. The method was validated according to the ICH Q2 R1 guidelines. A linear response (mean R2 > 0.997) covering the range for low TMM concentrations (170-520 mu g/ mL) was achieved. Satisfactory intra-day and inter-day precisions were obtained with RSDs lower than 1.9% and 2.8%, respectively. The trueness ranged from 99.6% to 101.2%, and the LOD was found to be 1.1 mu g/mL. The HILIC-CAD method has been applied to a sterile TMM solution for injection.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic comparison of sensitivity between hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry
    Periat, Aurelie
    Boccard, Julien
    Veuthey, Jean-Luc
    Rudaz, Serge
    Guillarme, Davy
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1312 : 49 - 57
  • [32] Direct injection analysis of oxypurinol and metformin in wastewater by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
    Zheng, Qiuda
    Dewapriya, Pradeep
    Eaglesham, Geoff
    Reeks, Tim
    Thompson, Jack
    Ahmed, Fahad
    Prasad, Pritesh
    Thomas, Kevin, V
    Mueller, Jochen F.
    Thai, Phong K.
    DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2022, 14 (08) : 1519 - 1524
  • [33] Comprehensive impurity profiling of nutritional infusion solutions by multidimensional off-line reversed-phase liquid chromatography x hydrophilic interaction chromatography-ion trap mass-spectrometry and charged aerosol detection with universal calibration
    Schiesel, Simone
    Laemmerhofer, Michael
    Lindner, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2012, 1259 : 100 - 110
  • [34] Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in the speciation analysis of selenium
    Sentkowska, Aleksandra
    Pyrzynska, Krystyna
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2018, 1074 : 8 - 15
  • [35] Practical investigation of the factors that affect the selectivity in hydrophilic interaction chromatography
    Kumar, Abhinav
    Heaton, James C.
    McCalley, David V.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1276 : 33 - 46
  • [36] Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography for the Analysis of Pharmaceutical Formulations
    Radoicic, Aleksandra
    Segan, Sandra
    Dramicanin, Aleksandra
    Milojkovic-Opsenica, Dusanka
    CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 20 (05) : 295 - 317
  • [37] Corona charged aerosol detector non-uniform response factors of purified alcohol ethoxylated homologues using liquid chromatography
    Dufour, Alizee
    Thiebaut, Didier
    Loriau, Matthieu
    Ligiero, Leticia
    Vial, Jerome
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1627 (1627)
  • [38] Destructive stationary phase gradients for reversed-phase/hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography
    Cain, Caitlin N.
    Forzano, Anna, V
    Rutan, Sarah C.
    Collinson, Maryanne M.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2018, 1570 : 82 - 90
  • [39] Simultaneous analysis of multiple neurotransmitters by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
    Tufi, Sara
    Lamoree, Marja
    de Boer, Jacob
    Leonards, Pim
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1395 : 79 - 87
  • [40] A systematic investigation of the effect of sample diluent on peak shape in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography
    Ruta, Josephine
    Rudaz, Serge
    McCalley, David V.
    Veuthey, Jean-Luc
    Guillarme, Davy
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2010, 1217 (52) : 8230 - 8240