The dynamics of the winner-loser gap in satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from a Swedish citizen panel

被引:46
作者
Dahlberg, Stefan [1 ]
Linde, Jonas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Qual Govt Inst, Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Comparat Polit, Polit Sci, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Winner-loser gap; satisfaction with democracy; political support; panel data; elections; Sweden; POLITICAL-INSTITUTIONS; ELECTION; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/0192512116649279
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Several studies have demonstrated a gap in support for the political system between electoral winners and losers. This research has generated a large stock of knowledge about the causes and effects of this winner-loser gap. However, we know little about the dynamics of the winner-loser gap over time. Drawing on a unique Swedish panel survey, this study investigates the stability of the winner-loser gap among Swedish voters over an electoral cycle of four years. The empirical analyses demonstrate a substantial consistency of the gap over time also when controlling for other determinants. The winner-loser gap thus seems to be a stable phenomenon rather than a short-lived election effect. The results are robust to different specifications and statistical techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 641
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[2]   Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Tverdova, YV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 47 (01) :91-109
[3]   Winning, losing and political trust in America [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
LoTempio, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :335-351
[4]  
ANDERSON CJ, 2001, INT POLITICAL SCI RE, V0022
[5]   How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective [J].
Banducci, SA ;
Karp, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 33 :443-467
[6]   Can't get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy [J].
Bernauer, Julian ;
Vatter, Adrian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (04) :435-468
[7]   Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy [J].
Blais, Andre ;
Gelineau, Francois .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2007, 55 (02) :425-441
[8]   Reasoning about institutional change: Winners, losers and support for electoral reforms [J].
Bowler, Shaun ;
Donovan, Todd .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 37 :455-476
[9]   Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy [J].
Canache, D ;
Mondak, JJ ;
Seligson, MA .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2001, 65 (04) :506-528
[10]  
Chang E, 2014, ELECTIONS DEMOCRACY, P232