Co-Innovation Network Driven Entrepreneurship in High-Tech Technology-Evidences from China

被引：0

作者：

Wang, Chun-Hsien ^{[1
]}

Huang, Shi-Zheng ^{[2
]}

Chang, Ching-Hsing ^{[1
]}

Lin, Po-Jin ^{[1
]}

Chiew, Yuan-Yin ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Chiayi Univ, Dept BioBusiness Management, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan

[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Business Management, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan

来源：

PICMET '15 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY | 2015年

关键词：

RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE NETWORKS; SCIENCE PARKS; INDUSTRY; FIRMS; COMPETITION; CLUSTERS; POLICY; GROWTH; COLLABORATION;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The establishment of high-tech industrial development zones (HID) is employed as an innovation policy instruments for developing industrial technological upgrading in emerging China. The government sponsored HIDs have proven to be remarkably in university-industry-government (U-I-G) coalition in driving academic knowledge and commercialized applications to which we refer as co-innovation network. The firms embedded in HIDs for obtaining co-innovation assistance resources as a new innovation and commercialization paradigm for government innovation policies. We applied an analytic inductive case-based method and social network analysis to study one particular co-innovation network for creating academic entrepreneurship firms in emerging market. Drawing on fine-grained two HIDs and large-scale survey firm-level data between 2010 and 2013 on Pearl River Delta (PRD), government sponsored co-innovation provide evidence of the different model through which university-industry (U-I) co-evolve and respective measures of commercializing academic knowledge success. Furthermore, the empirical results suggest that the government sponsored innovation is crucial drive force to the level of academic knowledge commercialization in emerging China market.

引用

页码：1002 / 1015

页数：14

共 67 条

[31]

Inkpen AC, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P146, DOI [10.2307/20159100, 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445]

[32] The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the US National Nanotechnology Initiative [J].

Jung, Hyun Ju ;

Lee, Jeongsik Jay .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (01) :74-91

[33]

Krueger N., 1994, ENTREP THEORY PRACT, V18, P91, DOI [10.1177/104225879401800307, DOI 10.1177/104225879401800307]

[34] Managing research and innovation networks: Evidence from a government sponsored cross-industry program [J].

Leven, Per ;

Holmstrom, Jonny ;

Mathiassen, Lars .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (01) :156-168

[35] China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory [J].

Liu, Feng-chao ;

Simon, Denis Fred ;

Sun, Yu-tao ;

Cao, Cong .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (07) :917-931

[36] Foreign competition, domestic knowledge base and innovation activities: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries [J].

Liu, Xiaohui ;

Hodgkinson, Ian R. ;

Chuang, Fu-Mei .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (02) :414-422

[37] Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms -: academic-industry links, innovation and markets [J].

Löfsten, H ;

Lindelöf, P .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (06) :859-876

[38] Localized learning revisited [J].

Malmberg, A ;

Maskell, P .

GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2006, 37 (01) :1-18

[39] University trustees as channels between academe and industry: Toward an understanding of the executive science network [J].

Mathies, Charles ;

Slaughter, Sheila .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (6-7) :1286-1300

[40]

Mokyr J., 2002, Technological Innovation and Economic Performance

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →