Permeability of different types of medical protective gloves to acrylic monomers

被引:27
作者
Lönnroth, EC [1 ]
Wellendorf, H
Ruyter, E
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Human Work Sci, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] NIOM, Scandinavian Inst Dent Mat, Haslum, Norway
关键词
gloves; protection; methyl methacrylate (MMA); ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA); 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate (1,4-BDMA);
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00064.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Dental personnel and orthopedic surgeons are at risk when manually handling products containing methyl methacrylate (MMA). Dental products may also contain cross-linking agents such as ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) or 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate (1,4-BDMA). Skin contact with monomers can cause hand eczema, and the protection given by gloves manufactured from different types of material is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine the breakthrough time (BTT, min) as a measure of protection (according to the EU standard EN-374-3) for a mixture consisting of MMA, EGDMA and 1,4-BDMA. Fifteen different gloves representing natural rubber latex material, synthetic rubber material (e g. nitrile rubbers), and synthetic polymer material were tested. The smallest monomer MMA permeated within 3 min through all glove materials. A polyethylene examination glove provided the longest protection period to EGDMA and 1,4-BDMA (>120 min and 25.0 min), followed by the surgical glove Tactylon (6.0 min and 8.7 min) and the nitrile glove Nitra Touch (5.0 min and 8.7 min). This study showed that the breakthrough time (based on permeation rate) cannot be regarded as a 'safe limit'. When the permeation rate is low, monomers may have permeated before BTT can be determined. Using double gloves with a synthetic rubber inner glove and a natural rubber outer glove provided longer protection when the inner glove was rinsed in water before placing the outer glove on top.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SKIN IRRITATION OF THE HANDS EXPERIENCED BY GENERAL DENTAL PRACTITIONERS
    BURKE, FJT
    WILSON, NHF
    CHEUNG, SW
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 32 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [2] *EUR COMM STAND, 1994, EN3743 EUR COMM ST 3
  • [3] The use of powdered gloves in dental practice: A cause for concern?
    Field, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (3-4) : 209 - 214
  • [4] Evaluation of patch test results with denture material series
    Gebhardt, M
    Geier, J
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 34 (03) : 191 - 195
  • [5] FREQUENCY OF TYPE-1 ALLERGY TO RUBBER GLOVES IN DENTAL STUDENTS
    HEESE, A
    PETERS, KP
    STAHL, J
    KOCH, HU
    HORNSTEIN, OP
    [J]. HAUTARZT, 1995, 46 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [6] Exposure to airborne methacrylates and natural rubber latex allergens in dental clinics
    Henriks-Eckerman, ML
    Alanko, K
    Jolanki, R
    Kerosuo, H
    Kanerva, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2001, 3 (03): : 302 - 305
  • [7] Prevalence of occupationally related hand dermatitis in dental workers
    Hill, JG
    Grimwood, RE
    Hermesch, CB
    Marks, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 129 (02) : 212 - 217
  • [8] *INT ORG STAND, 1994, 10282 ISO
  • [9] *INT ORG STAND, 1991, 4648 INT ORG STAND
  • [10] International Organization for Standardization, 1987, 3696 ISO