Communication Styles as Dimensions of National Culture

被引:53
作者
Smith, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
关键词
Communication; Acquiescence; Response Style; National Culture; World Values Survey; LEVEL DIMENSIONS; RESPONSE BIAS; SOCIAL AXIOMS; INDIVIDUALISM; ACQUIESCENCE; CONSEQUENCES; EXTREME; VALUES; GLOBE;
D O I
10.1177/0022022110396866
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Evidence is presented that national cultures may be distinguished in terms of prevalent styles of communication, as exemplified by survey response styles. A distinction is made between the average communication style within a given nation and the nation-level dispersion of communication styles. Secondary analyses of published values, beliefs, and personality data are used to test hypotheses concerning the attributes of nations that differ in terms of their citizens' tendencies to agree and to disagree, and in terms of frequency of response extremity versus moderation. The tendency of individuals in different nations to agree or disagree is most concisely explained by measures derived from the concept of individualism-collectivism. The nation-level frequencies of agreement plus disagreement are best explained by Minkov's dimension of monumentalism-flexumility. The benefits of controlling these response tendencies for extracting valid measures of cultural variation and for defining a fuller range of cultural dimensions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 233
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HUM DEV REP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 26 C INT ASS APPL PS
[3]  
[Anonymous], J CROSS CULTURAL PSY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, DOI DOI 10.1177/0022022105278546
[5]   Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures [J].
Bond, MH ;
Leung, K ;
Au, A ;
Tong, KK ;
de Carrasquel, SR ;
Murakami, F ;
Yamaguchi, S ;
Bierbrauer, G ;
Singelis, TM ;
Broer, M ;
Boen, F ;
Lambert, SM ;
Ferreira, MC ;
Noels, KA ;
van Bavel, J ;
Safdar, S ;
Zhang, JX ;
Chen, LN ;
Solcova, I ;
Stetovska, I ;
Niit, T ;
Niit, KK ;
Hurme, H ;
Böling, M ;
Franchi, V ;
Magradze, G ;
Javakhishvili, N ;
Boehnke, K ;
Klinger, E ;
Huang, X ;
Fulop, M ;
Berkics, M ;
Panagiotopoulou, P ;
Sriram, S ;
Chaudhary, N ;
Ghosh, A ;
Vohra, N ;
Iqbal, DF ;
Kurman, J ;
Thein, RD ;
Comunian, AL ;
Son, KA ;
Austers, I ;
Harb, C ;
Odusanya, JOT ;
Ahmed, ZA ;
Ismail, R ;
van de Vijver, F ;
Ward, C ;
Mogaji, A .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 35 (05) :548-570
[6]   Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 31 (02) :187-212
[8]   On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness [J].
Gelfand, Michele J. ;
Nishii, Lisa H. ;
Raver, Jana L. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1225-1244
[9]  
Gudykunst W., 1988, CULTURE INTERPERSONA
[10]  
Hall E.T., 1990, The hidden dimension