Grazing and global change factors differentially affect biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in grassland ecosystems

被引:49
|
作者
He, Miao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Yuhan [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Guiyao [1 ]
Barry, Kathryn E. [2 ]
Fu, Yuling [1 ]
Zhou, Xuhui [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm Sci, Ctr Global Change & Ecol Forecasting, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Utrecht, Inst Sci, Dept Biol, Ecol & Biodivers, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Nanjing Univ, Sch Life Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Northeast Forestry Univ, Northeast Asia Ecosystem Carbon Sink Res Ctr NACC, Ctr Ecol Res, Minist Educ,Sch Forestry,Key Lab Sustainable Fore, Harbin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biodiversity conservation; carbon sequestration; changed precipitation; grassland stability; N deposition; warming; PLANT DIVERSITY; SOIL RESPIRATION; NITROGEN DEPOSITION; SPECIES RICHNESS; METAANALYSIS; COMPETITION; RESPONSES; NUTRIENT; LIGHT; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16305
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Grazing and global change (e.g., warming, nitrogen deposition, and altered precipitation) both contribute to biodiversity loss and alter ecosystem structure and functioning. However, how grazing and global change interactively influence plant diversity and ecosystem productivity, and their relationship remains unclear at the global scale. Here, we synthesized 73 field studies to quantify the individual and/or interactive effects of grazing and global change factors on biodiversity-productivity relationship in grasslands. Our results showed that grazing significantly reduced plant richness by 3.7% and aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) by 29.1%, but increased belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) by 9.3%. Global change factors, however, decreased richness by 8.0% but increased ANPP and BNPP by 13.4% and 14.9%, respectively. Interestingly, the strength of the change in biodiversity in response to grazing was positively correlated with the strength of the change in BNPP. Yet, global change flipped these relationships from positive to negative even when combined with grazing. These results indicate that the impacts of global change factors are more dominant than grazing on the belowground biodiversity-productivity relationship, which is contrary to the pattern of aboveground one. Therefore, incorporating global change factors with herbivore grazing into Earth system models is necessary to accurately predict climate-grassland carbon cycle feedbacks in the Anthropocene.
引用
收藏
页码:5492 / 5504
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The selection of copiotrophs may complicate biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in microbial dilution-to-extinction experiments
    Zhendu Mao
    Zifan Zhao
    Jun Da
    Ye Tao
    Huabing Li
    Biying Zhao
    Peng Xing
    Qinglong Wu
    Environmental Microbiome, 18
  • [42] Alternative hypotheses to explain why biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships are concave-up in some natural ecosystems but concave-down in manipulative experiments
    Mora, Camilo
    Danovaro, Roberto
    Loreau, Michel
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [43] Alternative hypotheses to explain why biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships are concave-up in some natural ecosystems but concave-down in manipulative experiments
    Camilo Mora
    Roberto Danovaro
    Michel Loreau
    Scientific Reports, 4
  • [44] Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning (BEF) approach to further understanding aquaculture-environment interactions with application to bivalve culture and benthic ecosystems
    Lacoste, Elise
    McKindsey, Christopher W.
    Archambault, Philippe
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2020, 12 (04) : 2027 - 2041
  • [45] Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in long-term time series and palaeoecological records: deep sea as a test bed
    Yasuhara, Moriaki
    Doi, Hideyuki
    Wei, Chih-Lin
    Danovaro, Roberto
    Myhre, Sarah E.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1694)
  • [46] Effects of global changes on above- and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem functioning
    Wolters, V
    Silver, WL
    Bignell, DE
    Coleman, DC
    Lavelle, P
    Van der Putten, WH
    De Ruiter, P
    Rusek, J
    Wall, DH
    Wardle, DA
    Brussaard, L
    Dangerfield, JM
    Brown, VK
    Giller, KE
    Hooper, DU
    Sala, O
    Tiedje, J
    Van Veen, JA
    BIOSCIENCE, 2000, 50 (12) : 1089 - 1098
  • [47] Targeting the Active Rhizosphere Microbiome of Trifolium pratense in Grassland Evidences a Stronger-Than-Expected Belowground Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning Link
    Wahdan, Sara Fareed Mohamed
    Heintz-Buschart, Anna
    Sansupa, Chakriya
    Tanunchai, Benjawan
    Wu, Yu-Ting
    Schaedler, Martin
    Noll, Matthias
    Purahong, Witoon
    Buscot, Francois
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [48] Trophic and non-trophic interactions influence the mechanisms underlying biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships under different abiotic conditions
    Guerrero-Ramirez, Nathaly R.
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    OIKOS, 2017, 126 (12) : 1748 - 1759
  • [49] Interactive effects of global change drivers as determinants of the link between soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
    de Gea, Alejandro Berlinches
    Hautier, Yann
    Geisen, Stefan
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 296 - 307
  • [50] Do experiments exploring plant diversity-ecosystem functioning relationships inform how biodiversity loss impacts natural ecosystems?
    Wardle, David A.
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (03) : 646 - 653