GPR Data Interpretation Approaches in Archaeological Prospection

被引:26
作者
Manataki, Merope [1 ,2 ]
Vafidis, Antonis [1 ]
Sarris, Apostolos [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Crete, Sch Mineral Resources Engn, Khania 73100, Greece
[2] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Inst Mediterranean Studies, Lab Geophys Satellite Remote Sensing & Archaeoenv, Ioannou Melissinou 130 & Nikiforou Foka, Rethimnon 74100, Greece
[3] Univ Cyprus, Dept Hist & Archaeol, Archaeol Res Unit ARU, Digital Humanities Geolnformat Lab, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 16期
关键词
Ground Penetrating Radar; archaeological prospection; data interpretation; Convolutional Neural Networks; AlexNet; INTEGRATION; LANDSCAPES; AERIAL;
D O I
10.3390/app11167531
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the possible drawbacks and pitfalls in the GPR data interpretation process commonly followed by most GPR practitioners in archaeological prospection. Standard processing techniques aim to remove some noise, enhance reflections of the subsurface. Next, one has to calculate the instantaneous envelope and produce C-scans which are 2D amplitude maps showing high reflectivity surfaces. These amplitude maps are mainly used for data interpretation and provide a good insight into the subsurface but cannot fully describe it. The main limitations are discussed while studies aiming to overcome them are reviewed. These studies involve integrated interpretation approaches using both B-scans and C-scans, attribute analysis, fusion approaches, and recent attempts to automatically interpret C-scans using Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. To contribute to the automatic interpretation of GPR data using DL, an application of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to classify GPR data is also presented and discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   3D INTERPRETATION AND FUSION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY DATA FOR HERITAGE SCIENCE: A REVIEW [J].
Adamopoulos, E. ;
Rinaudo, F. .
27TH CIPA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: DOCUMENTING THE PAST FOR A BETTER FUTURE, 2019, 42-2 (W15) :17-24
[2]   Beyond GIS Layering: Challenging the (Re)use and Fusion of Archaeological Prospection Data Based on Bayesian Neural Networks (BNN) [J].
Agapiou, Athos ;
Sarris, Apostolos .
REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (11)
[3]  
Agapiou A, 2017, GEOSCIENCES, V7, DOI 10.3390/geosciences7020040
[4]   Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives [J].
Bengio, Yoshua ;
Courville, Aaron ;
Vincent, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) :1798-1828
[5]   Improving the interpretability of 3D GPR data using target-specific attributes: application to tomb detection [J].
Boeniger, U. ;
Tronicke, J. .
JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 37 (02) :360-367
[6]  
Conyers L. B., 2015, ARCHAEOL POL, V53, P202
[7]   Ground-Penetrating Radar Mapping Using Multiple Processing and Interpretation Methods [J].
Conyers, Lawrence B. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (07)
[8]   Analysis and interpretation of GPR datasets for integrated archaeological mapping [J].
Conyers, Lawrence B. .
NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 13 (06) :645-651
[9]  
Cothren J, P 36 INT C COMP APPL, P92
[10]   Autonomous pavement distress detection using ground penetrating radar and region-based deep learning [J].
Gao, Jie ;
Yuan, Dongdong ;
Tong, Zheng ;
Yang, Jiangang ;
Yu, Di .
MEASUREMENT, 2020, 164