Evaluation of reduced-order aeroelastic simulations for shock-dominated flows

被引:16
作者
Brouwer, Kirk R. [1 ]
Perez, Ricardo A. [2 ]
Beberniss, Timothy J. [2 ]
Spottswood, S. Michael [2 ]
Ehrhardt, David A. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARCTOS Technol Solut, Beavercreek, OH 45432 USA
[2] Air Force Res Lab, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
Model reduction; Shock/boundary layer interaction; Fluid-structure interaction; Panel flutter; Chaos; Largest Lyapunov exponent; FLUTTER ANALYSIS; RESPONSE PREDICTION; PANEL FLUTTER; PISTON THEORY; MODELS; STABILITY; AERODYNAMICS; DEFORMATION; FATIGUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103429
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Aeroelastic predictions of a thin panel in supersonic flow with a shock/boundary layer interaction (SBLI) are evaluated relative to wind tunnel experiments. Measured time histories of the panel displacement and velocity show stationary deflections as well as post-flutter oscillations for a range of shock impingement strengths. The fully coupled, computationally efficient aeroelastic modeling framework is formulated with a nonlinear structural reduced-order model and quasi-steady enriched piston theory aerodynamics. The aeroelastic model predicts the observed shape of the stationary responses with correlation coefficients larger than 0.8 for all SBLI conditions. In regards to dynamic responses, the model captures flutter onset as well as the post-flutter periodic oscillations for attached SBLI. The system's sensitivity to different initial conditions and shock impingement location is also investigated for attached SBLI. Shock-induced flow separation emerges as the SBLI strength increases. For the strongest shock, the computations predict flutter but do not capture the frequency content of the measured post-flutter response. This discrepancy is tied to the breakdown of the quasi-steady flow assumption in piston theory with increasing flow separation and highlights the need for unsteady flow models. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Anderson J.D., 2007, FUNDAMENTALS AERODYN, VFourth, P715
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, 1998208444 NASA TM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, CFL3D Version 6.4-General Usage and Aeroelastic Analysis
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1951, NACA TR 1081
  • [5] Barone M., 2008, 2008612 AIAA
  • [6] Fifty years of hypersonics: where we've been, where we're going
    Bertin, JJ
    Cummings, RM
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2003, 39 (6-7) : 511 - 536
  • [7] Experiments on a Thin Panel Excited by Turbulent Flow and Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    Perez, Ricardo A.
    Beberniss, Timothy J.
    Spottswood, S. Michael
    Ehrhardt, David A.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (07) : 2737 - 2752
  • [8] Investigation of aeroelastic instabilities for a thin panel in turbulent flow
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    Perez, Ricardo A.
    Beberniss, Timothy J.
    Spottswood, S. Michael
    Ehrhardt, David A.
    Wiebe, Richard
    [J]. NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2021, 104 (04) : 3323 - 3346
  • [9] Enriched Piston Theory for Expedient Aeroelastic Loads Prediction in the Presence of Shock Impingements
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    McNamara, Jack J.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (03) : 1288 - 1302
  • [10] Interplay of Surface Deformation and Shock-Induced Separation in Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    Gogulapati, Abhijit
    McNamara, Jack J.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (12) : 4258 - 4273