Detecting the impact of invasive species on native fauna: Cane toads (Bufo marinus), frillneck lizards (Chlamydosaurus kingii) and the importance of spatial replication

被引:13
作者
Ujvari, Beata [1 ,2 ]
Shine, Richard [2 ]
Madsen, Thomas [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Biol Sci, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Hungarian Acad Sci, Hungarian Nat Hist Museum, Anim Ecol Res Grp, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Anim Ecol, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
cane toad; ecological impact; frillneck lizard; invasive species; replication; DRIVEN POPULATION-DYNAMICS; TROPICAL AUSTRALIA; AGAMIDAE; WATER; PREDATORS; DISPERSAL; MORTALITY; BIOLOGY; ECOLOGY; RAIN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02126.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
An understanding of which native species are severely impacted by an anthropogenic change (such as the arrival of an invasive species) and which are not is critical to prioritizing conservation efforts. However, it is difficult to detect such impacts if the native taxa exhibit strong stochastic variations in abundance; a 'natural' population decline might be wrongly interpreted as an impact of the invader. Frillneck lizards (Chlamydosaurus kingii) are large iconic Australian agamids, and have been reported to decline following the invasion of toxic cane toads. We monitored three populations of the species in the savanna woodland of tropical Australia over a 7-year period bracketing toad arrival. One population crashed, one remained stable and one increased. Hence, studies on any single population might have inferred that cane toads have negative, negligible or positive effects on frillneck lizards. With the benefit of spatial replication, and in combination with observations of prey choice by captive lizards, our data suggest that invasive cane toads have had little or no effect on frillneck abundance.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 130
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Q REV BIOL IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1977, ANAL VERTEBRATE POPU
  • [3] Breeden K., 1963, Wildlife Australia, V1, P31
  • [4] DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
    CAUGHLEY, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) : 215 - 244
  • [5] The spatial ecology of cane toads (Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia:: Why do metamorph toads stay near the water?
    Child, Travis
    Phillips, Benjamin L.
    Brown, Gregory P.
    Shine, Richard
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 33 (05) : 630 - 640
  • [6] Abiotic and biotic influences on the dispersal behavior of metamorph cane toads (Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia
    Child, Travis
    Phillips, Benjamin L.
    Shine, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART A-ECOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 309A (04): : 215 - 224
  • [7] COCHRAN RM, 1961, LIVING AMPHIBIANS WO
  • [8] COGGER H, 2000, AUSTR REPTILES AMPHI
  • [9] FURTHER CLASSIFICATION OF SKIN ALKALOIDS FROM NEOTROPICAL POISON FROGS (DENDROBATIDAE), WITH A GENERAL SURVEY OF TOXIC NOXIOUS SUBSTANCES IN THE AMPHIBIA
    DALY, JW
    MYERS, CW
    WHITTAKER, N
    [J]. TOXICON, 1987, 25 (10) : 1023 - 1095
  • [10] Indirect impacts of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) on nest predation in pig-nosed turtles (Carettochelys insculpta)
    Doody, J. S.
    Green, B.
    Sims, R.
    Rhind, D.
    West, P.
    Steer, D.
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (05) : 349 - 354