Risk assessment for PPP waste-to-energy incineration plant projects in china based on hybrid weight methods and weighted multigranulation fuzzy rough sets

被引:37
作者
Luo, Chao [1 ]
Ju, Yanbing [1 ]
Dong, Peiwu [1 ]
Gonzalez, Ernesto D. R. Santibanez [2 ]
Wang, Aihua [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Talca, Dept Ingn Ind, Curico, Chile
[3] Peking Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk assessment; PPP WTE Incineration plant projects; BWM; Improved DEMATEL; Weighted multigranulation fuzzy rough sets; DECISION-MAKING; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; MODEL; ALLOCATION; SELECTION; NUMBERS; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2021.103120
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Implementing effective risk assessment for public-private partnership (PPP) waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration plant projects promotes the sustainable development of WTE incineration plants. However, some studies fail to consider multi-individuals participation and handle mutual compensation among risk factors, which affects the reliability of evaluation results and increases decision risks. Thus, we propose a methodology based on weighted multigranulation fuzzy rough sets (MGFRSs) over two universes to perform risk evaluation for PPP WTE incineration plant projects. Firstly, alternative risk factors are detected from different dimensions to construct a risk evaluation index system. Secondly, the BWM (best-worst method) is utilized to determined subjective expert weights and an improved DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method is developed to derive objective expert weights. Combining subjective and objective expert weights, an optimization model is built to form the collective expert weights. Thirdly, to avoid mutual compensation among risk factors, multisource heterogeneous information system-based weighted MGFRSs over two universes are proposed to evaluate PPP WTE plant projects and select a promising one. Finally, a case study is performed to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are implemented to demonstrate the robustness, effectiveness, and superiority of the proposed methodology.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Risk assessment framework of PPP-megaprojects focusing on risk interaction and project success [J].
Ahmadabadi, Ali Akbari ;
Heravi, Gholamreza .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 124 :169-188
[2]   Municipal solid waste management via mathematical modeling: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey [J].
Ayvaz-Cavdaroglu, Nur ;
Coban, Asli ;
Firtina-Ertis, Irem .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 244 :362-369
[3]   Recovery of gold via adsorption-incineration techniques using banana peel and its derivatives: Selectivity and mechanisms [J].
Bediako, John Kwame ;
Choi, Jong-Won ;
Song, Myung-Hee ;
Zhao, Yufeng ;
Lin, Shuo ;
Sarkar, Amit Kumar ;
Cho, Chul-Woong ;
Yun, Yeoung-Sang .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 113 :225-235
[4]   Anaerobic digestion of biowastes in India: Opportunities, challenges and research needs [J].
Breitenmoser, Lena ;
Gross, Thomas ;
Huesch, Ragini ;
Rau, Julius ;
Dhar, Hiya ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Hugi, Christoph ;
Wintgens, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 236 :396-412
[5]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[6]  
Council W E., 2016, World Energy Resources-Unconventional Gas, a Global Phenomenon
[7]   Multi-criteria decision analysis FANP based on GIS for siting municipal solid waste incineration power plant in the north of Iran [J].
Feyz, Sadaf ;
Khanmohammadi, Mehrdad ;
Abedinzadeh, Niloofar ;
Aalipour, Mehdi .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 47
[8]  
George J. J., 2019, INT RES J ENG TECHNO, V6, P2395
[9]   Analysis of the error in the standard approximation used for multiplication of triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and the development of a new approximation [J].
Giachetti, RE ;
Young, RE .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 91 (01) :1-13
[10]  
Grimsey D., 2002, Int. J. Proj. Manag., V20, P107, DOI [10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5]