A survey study investigating perceptions and acceptance of the whole-body imaging techniques used for the diagnosis of myeloma

被引:3
作者
Ryder, A. [1 ,2 ]
Parsons, C. [1 ]
Hutchinson, C. E. [1 ]
Greaney, B. [2 ]
Thake, C. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
[2] Coventry Univ, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
Low-dose whole-body computed tomography; Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging; Skeletal survey; Patient-centered care; Patient perceptions; Myeloma; DOSE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; CT; MRI; SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2021.06.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate patient perceptions and acceptance of the three whole-body imaging (WBI) modalities used for diagnosing myeloma; radiographic skeletal survey (RSS), low-dose whole-body computed tomography (LD-WBCT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). The secondary aim was to explore the factors affecting the acceptance of whole-body imaging for myeloma. Methods: 60 participants (median age = 58.5 years old) recruited from three NHS trusts and social media completed a survey in which they scored their experiences of each WBI modality on nine 5-point rating scales. Spearman's correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare scores between different WBI techniques. Participants were invited to provide additional open text responses for interpretation using thematic analysis. Results: All modalities demonstrated high levels of acceptability (median score = 4). WB-MRI was perceived as more stressful (p=<0.01) and claustrophobic (p=<0.01) than RSS and LD-WBCT. Thematic analysis showed patients understood the importance of imaging but had concerns about exacerbated pain and the results. WB-MRI was difficult to tolerate due to its duration. Respondents were averse to the physical manipulation required for RSS while remaining stationary was perceived as a benefit of LDWBCT and WB-MRI. Staff interactions had both positive and negative effects on acceptance. Conclusions: Despite the psychological and physical burdens of WBI, patients accepted its role in facilitating diagnosis. Staff support is vital for facilitating a positive whole-body imaging experience. Healthcare practitioners can improve WBI acceptance by understanding the burdens imposed by WBI and adopting the personalised care model. Implications for practice: Patient experience can be improved by tailoring examinations to individual needs. RSS can be as burdensome as other WBI techniques and could be superseded by LD-WBCT or WBMRI. Crown Copyright (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1157
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   From the radiographic skeletal survey to whole body MRI: 30 year-advances in imaging of multiple myeloma [J].
Lecouvet, Frederic ;
Vande Berg, Bruno ;
Malghem, Jacques ;
Maldague, Baudouin ;
Ferrant, Augustin ;
Michaux, Jean-Louis .
BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2018, 202 (5-6) :935-951
[22]   Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI in Myeloma: Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS) [J].
Messiou, Christina ;
Hillengass, Jens ;
Delorme, Stefan ;
Lecouvet, Frederic E. ;
Moulopoulos, Lia A. ;
Collins, David J. ;
Blackledge, Matthew D. ;
Abildgaard, Niels ;
Ostergaard, Brian ;
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ;
Landgren, Ola ;
Asmussen, Jon Thor ;
Kaiser, Martin F. ;
Padhani, Anwar .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) :4-12
[23]   Interobserver agreement of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is superior to whole-body computed tomography for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma [J].
Lai, Alta Y. T. ;
Riddell, Angela ;
Barwick, Tara ;
Boyd, Kevin ;
Rockall, Andrea ;
Kaiser, Martin ;
Koh, Dow-Mu ;
Saffar, Hind ;
Yusuf, Siraj ;
Messiou, Christina .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) :320-327
[24]   Interobserver agreement of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is superior to whole-body computed tomography for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma [J].
Alta Y. T. Lai ;
Angela Riddell ;
Tara Barwick ;
Kevin Boyd ;
Andrea Rockall ;
Martin Kaiser ;
Dow-Mu Koh ;
Hind Saffar ;
Siraj Yusuf ;
Christina Messiou .
European Radiology, 2020, 30 :320-327
[25]   Imaging for Multiple Myeloma according to the Recent International Myeloma Working Group Guidelines: Analysis of Image Acquisition Techniques and Response Evaluation in Whole-Body MRI to MY-RADS [J].
Son, A. Yeon ;
Chung, Hye Won .
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 84 (01) :150-169
[26]   Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study [J].
Michielsen, Katrijn L. M. ;
Vergote, Ignace ;
Dresen, Raphaela ;
Op de Beeck, Katya ;
Vanslembrouck, Ragna ;
Amant, Frederic ;
Leunen, Karin ;
Moerman, Philippe ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
De Keyzer, Frederik ;
Vandecaveye, Vincent .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1067)
[27]   Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Assessment of Treatment Response in Myeloma [J].
Giles, Sharon L. ;
Messiou, Christina ;
Collins, David J. ;
Morgan, Veronica A. ;
Simpkin, Catherine J. ;
West, Sharon ;
Davies, Faith E. ;
Morgan, Gareth J. ;
deSouza, Nandita M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) :785-794
[28]   Current concepts in tumor imaging with whole-body MRI with diffusion imaging (WB-MRI-DWI) in multiple myeloma and lymphoma [J].
Stecco, Alessandro ;
Buemi, Francesco ;
Iannessi, Antoine ;
Carriero, Alessandro ;
Gallamini, Andrea .
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2018, 59 (11) :2546-2556
[29]   Pediatric whole-body MRI: A review of current imaging techniques and clinical applications [J].
Davis, Joseph T. ;
Kwatra, Neha ;
Schooler, Gary R. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (04) :783-793
[30]   Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: techniques and non-oncologic indications [J].
Mary-Louise C. Greer .
Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 :1348-1363