Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors

被引:46
作者
Mackenzie, Alistair [1 ]
Honey, Ian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, KCARE, London SE5 9RS, England
关键词
computed radiography; noise power spectrum (NPS); image quality;
D O I
10.1118/1.2750973
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The performances of two generations of computed radiography (CR) were tested and compared in terms of resolution and noise characteristics. The main aim was to characterize and quantify the noise sources in the images. The systems tested were (1) Agfa CR 25.0, a flying spot reader with powder phosphor image plates (MD 40.0); and (2) the Agfa DX-S, a line-scanning CR reader with needle crystal phosphor image plates (HD 5.0). For both systems, the standard metrics of presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectra (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured using standard radiation quality RQA5 as defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission. The various noise sources contributing to the NNPS were separated by using knowledge of their relationship with air kerma, MTF, absorption efficiency and antialiasing filters. The DX-S MTF was superior compared with the CR 25.0. The maximum difference in MTF between the DX-S scan and CR 25.0 subscan directions was 0.13 at 1.3 mm(-1). For a nominal detector air kerma of 4 mu Gy, the peak DQE of the DX-S was 43(+/- 3)%, which was over double that of the CR 25.0 of 18( 2)%. The additive electronic noise was negligible on the CR 25.0 but calculated to be constant 3.4 x 10(-7) (+/- 0.4 x 10(-7)) mm(2) at 3.9 mu Gy on the DX-S. The DX-S has improved image quality compared with a traditional flying spot reader. The separation of the noise sources indicates that the improvements in DQE of the DX-S are due not only to the higher quantum, efficiency and MTF, but also the lower structure, secondary quantum, and excess noise. (C) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3345 / 3357
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations [J].
Andriole, KP .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2002, 15 (03) :161-169
[2]   Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography [J].
Aufrichtig, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1349-1358
[3]   Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics [J].
Boone, JM ;
Chavez, AE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) :1997-2005
[4]   Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control [J].
Carton, AK ;
Vandenbroucke, D ;
Struye, L ;
Maidment, ADA ;
Kao, YH ;
Albert, M ;
Bosmans, H ;
Marchal, G .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) :1684-1695
[5]  
CRANLEY K, 1997, 78 IPEM I PHYS ENG M
[6]  
CUNNINGHAM IA, 2000, PHYS PSYCHOPHYSICS, V1, P79
[7]   DQE(F) OF 4 GENERATIONS OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY ACQUISITION DEVICES [J].
DOBBINS, JT ;
ERGUN, DL ;
RUTZ, L ;
HINSHAW, DA ;
BLUME, H ;
CLARK, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1581-1593
[8]  
DRAGUSIN O, 2006, P SPIE, V6146
[9]   A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography [J].
Evans, DS ;
Workman, A ;
Payne, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (01) :117-135
[10]   Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical "front side" and novel "dual side" readout storage phosphors [J].
Fetterly, KA ;
Schueler, BA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (02) :290-296