Dosimetric Verification by Using the ArcCHECK System and 3DVH Software for Various Target Sizes

被引:9
作者
Song, Jin Ho [1 ]
Shin, Hun-Joo [2 ]
Kay, Chul Seung [2 ]
Son, Seok Hyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
PENCIL BEAM; DOSE CALCULATION; PASSING RATES; DIODE-ARRAY; PER-BEAM; IMRT QA; ACCURACY; PATIENT; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0119937
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the usefulness of the 3DVH software with an ArcCHECK 3D diode array detector in newly designed plans with various target sizes. Methods The isocenter dose was measured with an ion-chamber and was compared with the planned and 3DVH predicted doses. The 2D gamma passing rates were evaluated at the diode level by using the ArcCHECK detector. The 3D gamma passing rates for specific regions of interest (ROIs) were also evaluated by using the 3DVH software. Several dose-volume histograms (DVH)-based predicted metrics for all structures were also obtained by using the 3DVH software. Results The isocenter dose deviation was <1% in all plans except in the case of a 1 cm target. Besides the gamma passing rate at the diode level, the 3D gamma passing rate for specific ROIs tended to decrease with increasing target size; this was more noticeable when a more stringent gamma criterion was applied. No correlation was found with the gamma passing rates and the DVH-based metrics especially in the ROI with high-dose gradients. Conclusions Delivery quality assurance by using 3DVH and ArcCHECK can provide substantial information through a simple and easy approach, although the accuracy of this system should be judged cautiously.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION
    AHNESJO, A
    SAXNER, M
    TREPP, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) : 263 - 273
  • [2] Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance
    Ali, Imad
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 255 - 261
  • [3] AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Almond, PR
    Biggs, PJ
    Coursey, BM
    Hanson, WF
    Huq, MS
    Nath, R
    Rogers, DWO
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) : 1847 - 1870
  • [4] Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification
    Bedford, James L.
    Lee, Young K.
    Wai, Philip
    South, Christopher P.
    Warrington, Alan P.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) : N167 - N176
  • [5] DECOMPOSITION OF PENCIL BEAM KERNELS FOR FAST DOSE CALCULATIONS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING
    BORTFELD, T
    SCHLEGEL, W
    RHEIN, B
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [6] 3D DVH-based metric analysis versus per-beam planar analysis in IMRT pretreatment verification
    Carrasco, Pablo
    Jornet, Nuria
    Latorre, Artur
    Eudaldo, Teresa
    Ruiz, Agusti
    Ribas, Montserrat
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) : 5040 - 5049
  • [7] Using a Novel Dose QA Tool to Quantify the Impact of Systematic Errors Otherwise Undetected by Conventional QA Methods: Clinical Head and Neck Case Studies
    Chan, Maria F.
    Li, Jingdong
    Schupak, Karen
    Burman, Chandra
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [8] Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee
    Ezzell, GA
    Galvin, JM
    Low, D
    Palta, JR
    Rosen, I
    Sharpe, MB
    Xia, P
    Xiao, Y
    Xing, L
    Yu, CX
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) : 2089 - 2115
  • [9] IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Burmeister, Jay W.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    LoSasso, Thomas J.
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Molineu, Andrea
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Ramsey, Chester R.
    Salter, Bill J.
    Shi, Jie
    Xia, Ping
    Yue, Ning J.
    Xiao, Ying
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) : 5359 - 5373
  • [10] Evaluation of a new VMAT QA device, or the "X" and "O" array geometries
    Feygelman, Vladimir
    Zhang, Geoffrey
    Stevens, Craig
    Nelms, Benjamin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02): : 146 - 168