A double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS

被引:44
|
作者
Phillips, P
De Beule, K
Frechette, G
Tchamouroff, S
Vandercam, B
Weitner, L
Hoepelman, A
Stingl, G
Clotet, B
机构
[1] St Pauls Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Janssen Res Fdn, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium
[4] Clin Actuel, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Royal Sussex Cty Hosp, Brighton BN2 5BE, E Sussex, England
[6] St Luc Univ Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Utrecht Hosp, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis AIDS, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Utrecht Hosp, Eijkman Winkler Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[9] Dept Dermatol, Vienna, Austria
[10] Univ Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
[11] Retrovirol Lab, IRSI Caixa, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1086/516342
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
This double-blind trial compared the clinical and mycological efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution with those of fluconazole capsules in the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in patients with AIDS. A total of 244 patients were enrolled and randomized to one of three groups for treatment with itraconazole oral solution (100 mg twice daily for 7 days or 100 mg once daily for 14 days) or fluconazole capsules (100 mg once daily for 14 days). Among 194 evaluable cases, complete response (clearance of all symptoms and signs) or marked improvement was noted in 54 of 60 patients (90%) receiving once-daily itraconazole and in 65 of 72 fluconazole-treated patients (90%) at the end of treatment; these results were statistically equivalent (P = .0024). Twice-daily itraconazole produced a clinical response in 51 of 62 patients (82%). The groups were equivalent in terms of early relapse (within the 18-day period studied); 37% of patients in the twice-daily itraconazole group, 35% in the once-daily itraconazole group, and 34% in the fluconazole group relapsed. Drug tolerability was comparable between the three groups. These results show that, in the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis, itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole capsules at a 100-mg single daily dose for 14 days are equally effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1373
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Double-blind, randomized comparison of itraconazole capsules and placebo in onychomycosis of toenail
    Jones, HE
    Zaias, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 (08) : 589 - 590
  • [22] Itraconazole cyclodextrin solution for fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis in AIDS: Correlation of clinical response with in vitro susceptibility
    Phillips, P
    Zemcov, J
    Mahmood, W
    Montaner, JSG
    Craib, K
    Clarke, AM
    AIDS, 1996, 10 (12) : 1369 - 1376
  • [23] ONCE-WEEKLY FLUCONAZOLE TO PREVENT RECURRENCE OF OROPHARYNGEAL CANDIDIASIS IN PATIENTS WITH AIDS AND AIDS-RELATED COMPLEX - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    LEEN, CLS
    DUNBAR, EM
    ELLIS, ME
    MANDAL, BK
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 1990, 21 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [24] FLUCONAZOLE AND KETOCONAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF ORAL AND ESOPHAGEAL CANDIDIASIS IN AIDS PATIENTS
    BARCHIESI, F
    GIACOMETTI, A
    ARZENI, D
    BRANCHESI, P
    CRESCENZI, G
    ANCARANI, F
    SCALISE, G
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 4 (06) : 381 - 386
  • [25] Double-blind, randomized comparison of itraconazole capsules vs. placebo in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis
    Elewski, BE
    Scher, RK
    Aly, R
    Daniel, R
    Jones, HE
    Odom, RB
    Zaias, N
    Jacko, ML
    CUTIS, 1997, 59 (04): : 217 - 220
  • [26] Itraconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis: A double-blind comparison with miconazole
    Haneke, E
    Tajerbashi, M
    De Doncker, P
    Heremans, A
    DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 196 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [27] A randomized double-blind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis
    Villanueva, A
    Gotuzzo, E
    Arathoon, EG
    Noriega, LM
    Kartsonis, NA
    Lupinacci, RJ
    Smietana, JM
    DiNubile, MJ
    Sable, CA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 113 (04): : 294 - 299
  • [28] A randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis
    Krause, DS
    Simjee, AE
    van Rensburg, C
    Viljoen, J
    Walsh, TJ
    Goldstein, BP
    Wible, M
    Henkel, T
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (06) : 770 - 775
  • [29] A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial of voriconazole and fluconazole in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients
    Ally, R
    Schürmann, D
    Kreisel, W
    Carosi, G
    Aguirrebengoa, K
    Dupont, B
    Hodges, M
    Troke, P
    Romero, AJ
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (09) : 1447 - 1454
  • [30] An open multicentre comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of fluconazole and itraconazole in the treatment of cancer patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis
    Lashof, AMLO
    De Bock, R
    Herbrecht, R
    de Pauw, BE
    Krcmery, V
    Aoun, M
    Akova, M
    Cohen, J
    Siffnerová, H
    Egyed, M
    Ellis, M
    Marinus, A
    Sylvester, R
    Kullberg, BJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 40 (09) : 1314 - 1319