Does regional planning policy of Yangtze River Delta improve green technology innovation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:41
作者
Xu, Hong [1 ]
Qiu, Lei [1 ]
Liu, Baozhen [1 ]
Liu, Bei [2 ]
Wang, Hui [3 ]
Lin, Weifen [4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Business, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
[2] East China Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200241, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha 410006, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Regional planning; Green technology innovation; Difference-in-difference method; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; EMISSIONS; RESOURCES; COAL; CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENT; SPILLOVERS; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-14946-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green technology innovation is an important way to solve the dilemma of economic growth and environmental protection, while the relevant policies issued by the government have an important impact on the promotion of regional green technology innovation. This paper regards the implementation of the Regional Planning of Yangtze River Delta (RPYRD) as a quasi-natural experiment, using the panel data of 274 cities in China from 2003 to 2016 to explore the green technology innovation effect of regional planning and its transmission mechanisms through the double-fixed effect model and the difference-in-difference (DID) method. The results show that (1) the implementation of the RPYRD promotes regional green technology innovation significantly and the green technology innovation effect of the policy is increasing year by year. (2) There is significant regional heterogeneity in the incentive effect of green technology innovation in regional planning. The policy effect is more obvious in cities with a larger scale, a higher level of human capital and less resource dependence. (3) The regional planning promotes green technological innovation by optimizing industrial structure, reducing FDI and increasing R&D investment.
引用
收藏
页码:62321 / 62337
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[2]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[3]   Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions [J].
Apergis, Nicholas .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :263-271
[4]   CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Payne, James E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (08) :3282-3286
[5]   An empirical model on the impact of foreign direct investment on China's environmental pollution: analysis based on simultaneous equations [J].
Ayamba, Emmanuel Caesar ;
Haibo, Chen ;
Ibn Musah, Abdul-Aziz ;
Ruth, Appiah ;
Osei-Agyemang, Andrew .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (16) :16239-16248
[6]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[7]   Regional industrial policy for the manufacturing revolution: enabling conditions for complex transformations [J].
Bianchi, Patrizio ;
Labory, Sandrine .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 12 (02) :233-249
[8]   When regional innovation policies meet policy rationales and evidence: a plea for policy analysis [J].
Borras, Susana ;
Jordana, Jacint .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2016, 24 (12) :2133-2153
[9]   Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhang, Haijing ;
Li, Liang ;
Xie, Meiying .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 746
[10]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85