Toward the General Mechanistic Model of Liquid Chromatographic Retention

被引:9
作者
Kamedulska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Kubik, Lukasz [1 ]
Jacyna, Julia [1 ]
Struck-Lewicka, Wiktoria [1 ]
Markuszewski, Michal J. [1 ]
Wiczling, Pawel [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Biopharmaceut & Pharmacodynam, PL-80416 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
GRADIENT ELUTION; SELECTION; PH; PARAMETERS; EQUATIONS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02034
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Large datasets of chromatographic retention times are relatively easy to collect. This statement is particularly true when mixtures of compounds are analyzed under a series of gradient conditions using chromatographic techniques coupled with mass spectrometry detection. Such datasets carry much information about chromatographic retention that, if extracted, can provide useful predictive information. In this work, we proposed a mechanistic model that jointly explains the relationship between pH, organic modifier type, temperature, gradient duration, and analyte retention based on liquid chromatography retention data collected for 187 small molecules. The model was built utilizing a Bayesian multilevel framework. The model assumes (i) a deterministic Neue equation that describes the relationship between retention time and analyte-specific and instrument-specific parameters, (ii) the relationship between analyte-specific descriptors (log P, pK(a), and functional groups) and analyte-specific chromatographic parameters, and (iii) stochastic components of between-analyte and residual variability. The model utilizes prior knowledge about model parameters to regularize predictions which is important as there is ample information about the retention behavior of analytes in various stationary phases in the literature. The usefulness of the proposed model in providing interpretable summaries of complex data and in decision making is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:11070 / 11080
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ACD/Labs, 2011, RELEASE 12 0
[2]  
[Anonymous], Stan Modeling Language Users Guide and Reference Manual (version 2.31)
[3]   Comprehensive and Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Small Molecule LC Retention Time Prediction [J].
Bouwmeester, Robbin ;
Martens, Lennart ;
Degroeve, Sven .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 91 (05) :3694-3703
[4]   Prediction uncertainty assessment of chromatography models using Bayesian inference [J].
Briskot, Till ;
Stueckler, Ferdinand ;
Wittkopp, Felix ;
Williams, Christopher ;
Yang, Jessica ;
Konrad, Susanne ;
Doninger, Katharina ;
Griesbach, Jan ;
Bennecke, Moritz ;
Hepbildikler, Stefan ;
Hubbuch, Juergen .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2019, 1587 :101-110
[5]   Acids, Bases, and Salts in Mixed-Aqueous Solvents [J].
Cox, Brian G. .
ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 19 (12) :1800-1808
[6]   Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and dimensionality reduction techniques in quantitative structure retention relationship modeling of retention in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography [J].
Daghir-Wojtkowiak, Emilia ;
Wiczling, Pawel ;
Bocian, Szymon ;
Kubik, Lukasz ;
Koslinski, Piotr ;
Buszewski, Boguslaw ;
Kaliszan, Roman ;
Markuszewski, Michal Jan .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1403 :54-62
[7]  
Gelman A, 2020, REGRESSION OTHER STO
[8]   Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness [J].
Gneiting, Tilmann ;
Balabdaoui, Fadoua ;
Raftery, Adrian E. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2007, 69 :243-268
[9]   Support Vector Regression Based QSPR for the Prediction of Retention Time of Peptides in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography [J].
Golmohammadi, Hassan ;
Dashtbozorgi, Zahra ;
Heyden, Yvan Vander .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2015, 78 (1-2) :7-19
[10]   Adsorption mechanism in RPLC. Effect of the nature of the organic modifier [J].
Gritti, F ;
Guiochon, G .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 77 (13) :4257-4272