What do patients want from their radiation oncologist? Initial results from a prospective trial

被引:11
作者
Bhatnagar, Ajay K. [1 ,2 ]
Land, Stephanie R. [3 ]
Shogan, Alyson [1 ,2 ]
Rodgers, Edwin E. [4 ]
Heron, Dwight E. [1 ,2 ]
Flickinger, John C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Ctr Canc, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Canc, Dept Informat Technol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词
patient preferences; patient satisfaction; radiation oncologist;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.086
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess patients' initial physician preferences using a newly developed instrument. Methods and Materials: A total of 182 patients with a primary diagnosis of prostate, breast, or lung cancer referred for consultation to the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Department of Radiation Oncology enrolled in our institutional review board-approved protocol. All patients completed patient preference instrument surveys before meeting their radiation oncologist. Survey responses to 10 statements were categorized into three groups (agree, neutral, or disagree), and the association of survey responses by cancer site was tested with chi-squared tests. Results: Ninety-nine percent of all patients preferred to be addressed by their first name in encounters with their radiation oncologist. There were significant associations of Item 3 (hand holding) with gender (p = 0.039) and education (p = 0.028). The responses to Item 5, a statement that patients would feel uncomfortable if the radiation oncologist offered to hug them at the end of treatment, was significantly associated with disease site (p < 0.0001). Further analysis was performed for Item 5 and revealed that the male lung cancer patients had a much higher rate of disagreement with Item 5 compared with prostate cancer patients (37% vs. 18%). Conclusions: Results of this study may afford greater insight and foster better understanding of what patients want from their radiation oncologist. For breast, lung, and prostate cancer patients, initial preferences for their radiation oncologist are generally similar, according to this tool. However, there are important difference among cancer sites (and gender) regarding physical contact at the end of treatment. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1533
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ASAI A, 1995, WESTERN J MED, V163, P36
[2]  
DiConsiglio John, 2003, Mater Manag Health Care, V12, P14
[3]   Hospitalised patients' views on doctors and white coats [J].
Gooden, BR ;
Smith, MJ ;
Tattersall, SJN ;
Stockler, MR .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2001, 175 (04) :219-222
[4]   ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF PHYSICIAN-PATIENT INTERACTIONS ON THE OUTCOMES OF CHRONIC DISEASE [J].
KAPLAN, SH ;
GREENFIELD, S ;
WARE, JE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S110-S127
[5]   Development and testing of a visit-specific patient satisfaction questionnaire: The Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction with Doctor Questionnaire [J].
Loblaw, DA ;
Bezjak, A ;
Bunston, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) :1931-1938
[6]   Patient information in radiooncology -: Results of a patient survey [J].
Schäfer, C ;
Dietl, B ;
Putnik, K ;
Altmann, D ;
Marienhagen, J ;
Herbst, M .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (10) :562-571
[7]   Hearing the bad news of a cancer diagnosis: The Australian melanoma patient's perspective [J].
Schofield, PE ;
Beeney, LJ ;
Thompson, JF ;
Butow, PN ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Dunn, SM .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) :365-371
[8]  
Searight HR, 2005, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V71, P515
[9]   BUILDING AN EFFECTIVE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP - FROM PATIENT SATISFACTION TO PATIENT PARTICIPATION [J].
SPEEDLING, EJ ;
ROSE, DN .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1985, 21 (02) :115-120
[10]   Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers [J].
Steinhauser, AE ;
Christakis, NA ;
Clipp, EC ;
McNeilly, M ;
McIntyre, L ;
Tulsky, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (19) :2476-2482