Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation

被引:116
作者
Barvais, L
Engelman, E
Eba, JM
Coussaert, E
Cantraine, F
Kenny, GN
机构
[1] Erasme Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, B-1070 Anderlecht, Belgium
[2] Erasme Univ Hosp, Fac Med, B-1070 Anderlecht, Belgium
[3] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
anaesthetics i.v; propofol; analgesics opioid; remifentanil; eye; pupil size; reflexes;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeg178
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Opioid drugs block reflex pupillary dilatation in response to noxious stimulation. The relationship between the target effect site concentration (Ce-T) of remifentanil and the pupil diameter and reactivity in response to a standard noxious stimulus were evaluated. Methods. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol TCI to obtain loss of consciousness (LOC) in 12 ASA I/II patients. Thereafter, remifentanil Ce-T was titrated by increments of 1 up to 5 ng ml(-1). In the awake state, at LOC and at each plateau level of remifentanil Ce-T, arterial pressure, heart rate, and BIS (A2000) were recorded. Pupil size and dilatation after a 100 Hz tetanic stimulation (T100) were measured at LOC and at each plateau level of remifentanil Ce-T. Results. LOC was observed at a mean propofol Ce-T of 3.53 (sd 0.43) mug ml(-1). Arterial pressure and heart rate decreased progressively from LOC to 5 ng ml(-1) remifentanil Ce-T without any statistical difference between each incremental dose of remifentanil. Mean BIS values decreased from 96 (2) in the awake state, to 46 (12) at LOC (P<0.05) and then remained unchanged at all remifentanil Ce-T. Pupil dilatation in response to 100 Hz tetanic stimulation decreased progressively from 1.55 (0.72) to 0.01 (0.03) mm and was more sensitive than pupil diameter measured before and after 100 Hz tetanus. An inverse correlation between pupil dilatation in response to 100 Hz tetanus and an increase in remifentanil Ce-T from 0 to 5 ng ml(-1) was found (R-2=0.68). Conclusions. During propofol TCI in healthy patients, the decrease in pupil response to a painful stimulus is a better measurement of the progressive increase of remifentanil Ce-T up to 5 ng ml(-1) than haemodynamic or BIS measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The first object oriented monitor for intravenous anesthesia [J].
Cantraine, FRL ;
Coussaert, EJA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2000, 16 (01) :3-10
[2]   FENTANYL, CLONIDINE, AND REPEATED INCREASES IN DESFLURANE CONCENTRATION, BUT NOT NITROUS-OXIDE OR ESMOLOL, BLOCK THE TRANSIENT MYDRIASIS CAUSED BY RAPID INCREASES IN DESFLURANE CONCENTRATION [J].
DANIEL, M ;
LARSON, MD ;
EGER, EI ;
NOORANI, M ;
WEISKOPF, RB .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :372-378
[3]  
DANIEL M, 2001, BR J CLIN PHARM, V1, P27
[4]   SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN HUMANS WITH PROPOFOL OR ETOMIDATE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
BERENS, R ;
GOFF, D ;
KAMPINE, JP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :725-733
[5]   Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers [J].
Glass, PS ;
Bloom, M ;
Kearse, L ;
Rosow, C ;
Sebel, P ;
Manberg, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (04) :836-847
[6]   Neuromuscular blocking drugs do not alter the pupillary light reflex of anesthetized humans [J].
Gray, AT ;
Krejci, ST ;
Larson, MD .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 54 (05) :579-584
[7]   The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation [J].
Guignard, B ;
Menigaux, C ;
Dupont, X ;
Fletcher, D ;
Chauvin, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (01) :161-167
[8]  
Iselin-Chaves IA, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V87, P949
[9]   Comparison of the effect-site keOs of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients [J].
Kazama, T ;
Ikeda, K ;
Morita, K ;
Kikura, M ;
Doi, M ;
Ikeda, T ;
Kurita, T ;
Nakajima, Y .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (06) :1517-1527
[10]   Reduction of isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration by remifentanil [J].
Lang, E ;
Kapila, A ;
Shlugman, D ;
Hoke, JF ;
Sebel, PS ;
Glass, PSA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (04) :721-728