Self-Managed Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Breast Cancer Survivors: Systematic Quality Appraisal and Content Analysis of Clinical Practice Guidelines

被引:8
作者
Tan, Jing-Yu [1 ]
Zhai, Jianxia [2 ]
Wang, Tao [3 ]
Zhou, Hong-Juan [4 ]
Zhao, Isabella [3 ,5 ]
Liu, Xian-Liang [3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Nursing & Midwifery, Casuarina, NT, Australia
[2] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne Hub, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Charles Darwin Univ, Coll Nursing & Midwifery, Brisbane Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Sch Nursing, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Queensland Univ Technol, Canc & Palliat Care Outcomes Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; self-management; non-pharmacological interventions; clinical practice guidelines; content analysis; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; FOLLOW-UP; CARE; PROSTATE; BENEFITS; THERAPY; DISEASE; FAMILY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.866284
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A growing number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with regards to non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors are available. However, given the limitations in guideline development methodologies and inconsistency of recommendations, it remains uncertain how best to design and implement such non-pharmacological strategies to tailor interventions for breast cancer survivors with varied health conditions, healthcare needs, and preferences. Aim: To critically appraise and summarise available non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management and health promotion that can be self-managed by breast cancer survivors based on the recommendations of the CPGs. Methods: Clinical practice guidelines which were published between January 2016 and September 2021 and described non-pharmacological interventions for breast cancer survivors were systematically searched in six electronic databases, nine relevant guideline databases, and five cancer care society websites. The quality of the included CPGs was assessed by four evaluators using the Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation, second edition tool. Content analysis was conducted to synthesise the characteristics of the non-pharmacological interventions that were recommended by the included CPGs, such as the intervention's form, duration and frequency, level of evidence, grade of recommendation, and source of evidence. Results: Fourteen CPGs were identified and analysed. Of the 14 CPGs appraised, only five were rated as high quality. The domain with the highest standardised percentage was "scope and purpose" (84.61%), while the "applicability" domain had the lowest standardised percentage (51.04%). Five guidelines were assessed as "recommended", seven were rated as "recommended with modifications", and the remaining two were considered "not recommended". Regarding the content analysis, physical activity/exercise, meditation, hypnosis, yoga, music therapy, stress management, relaxation, massage, and acupressure were the common self-managed non-pharmacological interventions recommended by the 14 CPGs. Physical activity/exercise was the only self-managed non-pharmacological intervention that was mostly recommended for psychological and physical symptom management by the included CPGs. However, there were significant disparities in terms of level of evidence and grade of recommendation in the included CPGs. Conclusion: The recommendations for the self-managed non-pharmacological interventions were varied and limited among the 14 CPGs, and some were based on medium- and low-quality evidence. More rigorous methods are required to develop high-quality CPGs in order to guide clinicians in offering high-quality and tailored breast cancer survivorship care.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
AGREE Next Steps Consortium, 2017, AGREE 2 INSTR
[2]   Breast Cancer Statistics: Recent Trends [J].
Ahmad, Aamir .
BREAST CANCER METASTASIS AND DRUG RESISTANCE: CHALLENGES AND PROGRESS, 2ND EDITION, 2019, 1152 :1-7
[3]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC EARL DIA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ENHANCING THE RESILIENCE OF THE NATIONS ELECTRICITY SYSTEM, P54
[5]   SEOM clinical guidelines in early stage breast cancer (2018) [J].
Ayala de la Pena, F. ;
Andres, R. ;
Garcia-Saenz, J. A. ;
Manso, L. ;
Margeli, M. ;
Dalmau, E. ;
Pernas, S. ;
Prat, A. ;
Servitja, S. ;
Ciruelos, E. .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 (01) :18-30
[6]   A Personalized, Dynamic Physical Activity Intervention Is Feasible and Improves Energetic Capacity, Energy Expenditure, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors [J].
Ballinger, Tarah J. ;
Althouse, Sandra K. ;
Olsen, Timothy P. ;
Miller, Kathy D. ;
Sledge, Jeffrey S. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[7]   Recommendations for the follow-up care of female breast cancer survivors: a guideline of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), Spanish Society of General Medicine (SEMERGEN), Spanish Society for Family and Community Medicine (SEMFYC), Spanish Society for General and Family Physicians (SEMG), Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SEGO), Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Pathology (SESPM), and Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) [J].
Barnadas, A. ;
Algara, M. ;
Cordoba, O. ;
Casas, A. ;
Gonzalez, M. ;
Marzo, M. ;
Montero, A. ;
Munoz, M. ;
Ruiz, A. ;
Santolaya, F. ;
Fernandez, T. .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 (06) :687-694
[8]   Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review [J].
Boland, Lauren ;
Bennett, Kathleen ;
Connolly, Deirdre .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (05) :1585-1595
[9]   The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines [J].
Brouwers, Melissa C. ;
Kerkvliet, Kate ;
Spithoff, Karen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[10]   Estimating the benefits of therapy for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019 [J].
Burstein, H. J. ;
Curigliano, G. ;
Loibl, S. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Poortmans, P. ;
Colleoni, M. ;
Denkert, C. ;
Piccart-Gebhart, M. ;
Regan, M. ;
Senn, H. -J. ;
Winer, E. P. ;
Thurlimann, B. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (10) :1541-1557