Pore pressure evaluation of formation testing while drilling under supercharged conditions

被引:13
作者
Peng, Nian [1 ]
Ma, Tianshou [1 ]
Chen, Ping [1 ]
Liu, Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploita, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pore pressure; Formation evaluation; Formation testing while drilling; Supercharging; Pressure response; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108689
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Formation Testing While Drilling (FTWD) to evaluate pore pressure has significantly progressed in geo-energy exploitation. However, with the increasing number of unconventional reservoirs, this technology is facing some challenges owing to the common occurrence of supercharging in the vicinity of boreholes. The pressure response of FTWD under supercharged conditions is different from that of non-supercharged; thus, conventional methods - such as Pressure DrawDown (PDD), Pressure BuildUp (PBU), and Formation Rate Analysis (FRA) - cannot be used to determine the original pore pressure. In this paper, a new mathematical model of the FTWD pressure response under supercharged conditions is proposed by considering the time-dependent filter cake, supercharging, skin, geometry, and storage effects. The calculated results indicated that when the formation permeability was lower than 5 mD, the supercharging effect on the pressure response of FTWD cannot be neglected. The pressure response curve of FTWD under supercharged conditions only includes three segments: the fast pressure drawdown stage, pressure buildup stage, and recovered pressure decreasing stage. It is also found that the pressure response in the later stage is independent of the withdraw withdrawal pumping modes and the pressure response curves are nearly the same. Based on the pressure response characteristics, a novel method to evaluate the original pore pressure was proposed. Case studies show that the proposed method can obtain the correct virgin pore pressure after a few iterations and the relative error is lower than 0.2%. Compared with conventional methods, this method is more accurate and saves time; thus, it can be used to evaluate the original pore pressure of FTWD under supercharged conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Well-Testing Challenges in Unconventional and Tight-Gas-Formation Reservoirs [J].
Azari, Mehdi ;
Hamza, Farrukh ;
Hadibeik, Hamid ;
Ramakrishna, Sandeep .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 (04) :1371-1384
[2]  
Bildstein J., 2005, SPE EUR EAGE ANN C M, DOI [10.2118/94076-MS, DOI 10.2118/94076-MS]
[3]  
Blanco Y., 2013, EAGE ANN C EXH INC S, DOI [10.2118/164866-MS, DOI 10.2118/164866-MS]
[4]   When should we worry about supercharging in formation-pressure-while-drilling measurements? [J].
Chang, Yong ;
Hammond, Paul S. ;
Pop, Julian J. .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2008, 11 (01) :165-174
[5]  
Chin W.C, 2019, FORMATION TESTING SU, P69
[6]  
Chin W.C., 2014, FORMATION TESTING PR, P159
[7]   Numerical analysis of the effects of downhole dynamic conditions on formation testing while drilling [J].
Di Dejia ;
Tao Guo ;
Wang Bing ;
Chen Xu ;
Sun Jiming .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2014, 11 (03) :391-400
[8]   An easy-to-implement numerical method for quantifying time-dependent mudcake effects on near-wellbore stresses [J].
Feng, Yongcun ;
Li, Xiaorong ;
Gray, K. E. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 164 :501-514
[9]  
Gelvez C., 2019, SPWLA 60 ANN LOGG S
[10]  
Hadibeik H., 2012 SPE ANN TECHN C, DOI [10.2118/159172-MS, DOI 10.2118/159172-MS]