Training, practice, and referral patterns in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: Survey of general surgeons

Subspecialization has changed the way that general surgery is practiced. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery (HPB) is maturing as a subspecialty. The objective of this study was to identify the current levels of practice, self-assessments of adequacy of training, referral patterns, and perceptions regarding regionalization of HPB care to high-volume centers. A total of 240 nonstratified general surgeons from across Canada were randomly selected to receive a survey developed by an expert work group. A reference group of 10 HPB specialists were also polled for a total of 2 50 respondents. The overall response rate was 73% (182 responders). Subspecialty training had been completed by 65% of respondents. This included surgical oncology (15%), HPB (15%), HPB and transplant (8%), laparoscopy (7%), liver transplantation (5%), and other (50%). This training was obtained in Canada (51%), the United States (3 5%), Europe (11%), and Australia (3%). Ninety-five percent of responders believed that some HPB services should be regionalized. Similarly, most responders thought that they were not adequately trained to perform these procedures. The following were especially considered subspecialty procedures: major hepatectomy (93%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (90%), and biliary reconstruction (79%). The majority of non-HPB surgeons do not consider themselves adequately trained to perform complex HPB procedures. Furthermore, most surgeons think that major hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and biliary reconstruction should be referred to HPB specialists at high-volume centers. (C) 2005 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract