Time-Dependent Climate Impact and Energy Efficiency of Internationally Traded Non-torrefied and Torrefied Wood Pellets from Logging Residues

被引:13
作者
Porso, Charlotta [1 ]
Hammar, Torun [1 ]
Nilsson, Daniel [1 ]
Hansson, Per-Anders [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, POB 7032, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Life cycle assessment; LCA; Global warming; Time-dependent climate impact; Biogenic carbon; Torrefied wood pellets; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FOREST BIOMASS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; SUPPLY CHAINS; CO2; EMISSIONS; BIOENERGY; BALANCE; MARKET; TORREFACTION; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-017-9884-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Demand for wood pellets as a renewable alternative to fossil fuels has increased in the past decade. However, production and use of wood pellets involves several operations (biomass extraction, chipping, transport, drying, milling, pelleting, combustion) with negative impacts on e.g. the climate. In this study, the energy efficiency and climate impact of production and use of non-torrefied and torrefied wood pellets were analysed and compared. The wood pellets, produced from logging residues extracted from a boreal coniferous forest stand (Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst)) in northern Sweden, were assumed to be exported and finally used in a power plant. Time-dependent life cycle assessment, expressing the climate impact as global temperature change over time, was used to include annual greenhouse gas fluxes of both fossil and biogenic origin. The results showed that carbon stock changes due to extraction of logging residues contributed most of the warming effect on global temperature. Due to greater demand for raw material, a higher warming impact per gigajoule fuel was obtained for torrefied wood pellets than for non-torrefied wood pellets. However, torrefied wood pellets demonstrated a lower climate impact (per GJ electricity) when advantages such as higher electrical energy efficiency and higher co-firing rate were included. A general conclusion from this study is that replacing coal with non-torrefied or torrefied wood pellets made from logging residues can mitigate climate change. The energy output of these systems was about sevenfold the primary energy input.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 151
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth - A meta-analysis [J].
Achat, D. L. ;
Deleuze, C. ;
Landmann, G. ;
Pousse, N. ;
Ranger, J. ;
Augusto, L. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 348 :124-141
[2]   Torrefied versus conventional pellet production - A comparative study on energy and emission balance based on pilot-plant data and EU sustainability criteria [J].
Agar, D. ;
Gil, J. ;
Sanchez, D. ;
Echeverria, I. ;
Wihersaari, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :621-630
[3]   Bio-coal, torrefied lignocellulosic resources - Key properties for its use in co-firing with fossil coal - Their status [J].
Agar, D. ;
Wihersaari, M. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 44 :107-111
[4]   A review of biomass co-firing in North America [J].
Agbor, Ezinwa ;
Zhang, Xiaolei ;
Kumar, Amit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :930-943
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT
[6]  
[Anonymous], SWED FOR SOIL INV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, V80, P1
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MILJOFAKTABOK BRANSL
[9]  
[Anonymous], SWED NAT FOR INV
[10]  
[Anonymous], 25354 EUR EN