A map representation of the ASET-RSET concept

被引:23
作者
Schroeder, Benjamin [1 ]
Arnold, Lukas [2 ,3 ]
Seyfried, Armin [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Gortzen Stolbrink & Partner mbB, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Adv Simulat, Julich, Germany
[3] Berg Univ Wuppertal, Computat Civil Engn, Wuppertal, Germany
[4] Berg Univ Wuppertal, Comp Simulat Fire Safety & Pedestrian Traff, Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
Performance-based design; Life safety analysis; ASET; RSET; Safety margin; Map analysis; Consequence quantification; EVACUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103154
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Assessing life safety by comparing the available safe egress time (ASET) and the required safe egress time (RSET) is a prominent task in performance-based fire safety design. The calculation of a safety margin by subtracting RSET from ASET is a straightforward concept and is easy to understand. However, when the concept was developed, fire and evacuation models only provided punctual information derived from experimental correlations or hand calculations. Nowadays, complex computer models for fire and evacuation dynamics have become state of the art. However, the ASET-RSET concept has not adapted to these developments. While uncertainties related to the model input and the model application are widely recognised, uncertainties emerging from analysing the output only play a subordinate role. Therefore, we introduce a map representation of ASET and RSET. The maps are generated by a spatial evaluation of the quantities used to determine ASET and RSET. Based on that, a difference map is introduced to represent the safety margin throughout the entire domain. Finally, a method is proposed to reduce the high information content of the difference maps to one scalar measure of consequences. This facilitates multivariate or risk-based analysis approaches and thus is able to reduce the uncertainties in performance-based design.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 180091201504 DIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANSYS CFX Reference Guide, V12.1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Planing for Foot Traffic Flow in Buildings
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 13387 ISOTR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 79746 BSI
[6]   RSET/ASET, a flawed concept for fire safety assessment [J].
Babrauskas, Vytenis ;
Fleming, Joseph M. ;
Russell, B. Don .
FIRE AND MATERIALS, 2010, 34 (07) :341-355
[7]  
Bukowski R.W., 1975, NBSGCR7551 US NAT BU
[8]   A CONCEPT FOR ESTIMATING AVAILABLE SAFE EGRESS TIME IN FIRES [J].
COOPER, LY .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 1983, 5 (02) :135-144
[9]  
Curtis S., 2016, COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.17815/CD.2016.1, 10.17815/CD.2016.1]
[10]  
Ewer J., 1999, J FIRE PROTECT ENG, V10, P13, DOI DOI 10.1177/104239159901000102