Modelling the interfacial peeling of pressure-sensitive adhesives

被引:40
作者
Mohammed, I. K. [1 ]
Charalambides, M. N. [1 ]
Kinloch, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Mech Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Pressure-sensitive adhesive; Peeling; Finite element; Viscoelastic; Cohesive zones; Tack; FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH; DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS; COHESIVE ZONE MODELS; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; BULK PROPERTIES; TACK; FRACTURE; JOINTS; PAPER; SKIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.005
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Peel tests were performed using specimens which consisted of a polyester backing membrane supporting an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive adhered to a polyethylene substrate. Interfacial separation of the PSA from the polyethylene substrate was observed. Finite element (FE) peeling simulations were conducted which modelled the backing-membrane as an elasto-plastic power-law material, the adhesive as a viscoelastic material and the interfacial properties with a cohesive zone model (CZM). The material properties of the backing membrane and the pressure-sensitive adhesive were measured from tensile and stress relaxation experiments. The cohesive zone parameters were calculated analytically from the peel test data, as well as being measured directly from independent poker-chip probe tack tests. The numerical results from the CZM/FE simulations and the experimental values of the peel forces as a function of the peel angle were found to be in good agreement. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AB VERS 6 13
[2]   The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fibre composites and adhesively-bonded joints [J].
Blackman, BRK ;
Hadavinia, H ;
Kinloch, AJ ;
Williams, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2003, 119 (01) :25-46
[3]   Comparison of Tack of Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives (PSAs) at Different Temperatures [J].
Chiang, W. K. ;
Ghassemieh, E. ;
Lewis, R. ;
Rowson, J. ;
Thompson, C. .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (11-12) :1949-1957
[4]   Effects of bond gap thickness on the fracture of nano-toughened epoxy adhesive joints [J].
Cooper, V. ;
Ivankovic, A. ;
Karac, A. ;
McAuliffe, D. ;
Murphy, N. .
POLYMER, 2012, 53 (24) :5540-5553
[5]   Pressure-sensitive adhesives: An introductory course [J].
Creton, C .
MRS BULLETIN, 2003, 28 (06) :434-439
[6]  
Creton C, 1996, J POLYM SCI POL PHYS, V34, P545, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199602)34:3<545::AID-POLB13>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]   A calibrated finite element model of adhesive peeling [J].
Cui, J ;
Wang, R ;
Sinclair, AN ;
Spelt, JK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2003, 23 (03) :199-206
[9]   On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, Part II: Inelastic peeling of an epoxy-bonded aluminum strip [J].
Diehl, Ted .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2008, 28 (4-5) :256-265
[10]  
Duncan B., 1999, MEASUREMENT GOOD PRA, V26