Efficacy and safety of a therapeutic interchange from high-dose calcium channel blockers to a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/benazepril in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension

被引:9
作者
Hilleman, DE [1 ]
Reyes, AP [1 ]
Wurdeman, RL [1 ]
Faulkner, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Pharm & Allied Hlth Profess, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
关键词
combination therapy; cost-effectiveness; ACE inhibitor; calcium channel blocker; amlodipine; benazepril; felodipine; nifedipine;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001230
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Recent hypertension trials have demonstrated the importance of achieving goal blood pressures to reduce the risk of target organ damage. In patients with moderate to severe hypertension, the use of high-dose monotherapy and/or combinations of drugs are necessary to achieve these goals. Fixed-dose combination products may be useful in these patients by reducing the number of daily doses required to control blood pressure. Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic interchange between high-dose calcium channel blocker therapy and a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/benazepril (Lotrel (R); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, USA) in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Methods: A total of 75 patients were switched from amlodipine (n = 25), felodipine (n = 25), and nifedipine-GITS (n = 25) to amlodipine/benazepril. Twenty-eight of the 75 patients (37%) were taking either a beta-blocker or a diuretic in addition to the high-dose calcium channel blocker prior to the switch. Blood pressure control, side effects and the cost of the therapeutic interchange were evaluated in the year following the therapeutic interchange. Results: Sixty-six of the 75 (88%) patients were successfully switched with maintenance of blood pressure control and without the development of new dose-limiting side effects. Reasons for treatment failure after the therapeutic interchange included loss of blood pressure control in five patients and the development of new dose-limiting side effects in four patients. These side effects included cough in three patients and rash in one patient. After accounting for differences in drug acquisition cost and costs related to the switch (clinic and emergency room and laboratory tests), a cost savings of $16030 for all 75 patients was realised in the first year. The per patient-per year cost savings was $214. Conclusions: Our data indicate that a therapeutic interchange from selected high-dose calcium channel blockers to a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/benazepril can be successfully accomplished in the majority of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 565
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005
[2]   Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) [J].
Brown, MJ ;
Palmer, CR ;
Castaigne, A ;
de Leeuw, PW ;
Mancia, G ;
Rosenthal, T ;
Ruilope, LM .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :366-372
[3]   Newer approaches to antihypertensive therapy - Use of fixed-dose combination therapy [J].
Epstein, M ;
Bakris, G .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (17) :1969-1978
[4]   COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE AND BENAZEPRIL MONOTHERAPY TO AMLODIPINE PLUS BENAZEPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC HYPERTENSION - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY [J].
FRISHMAN, WH ;
RAM, CVS ;
MCMAHON, FG ;
CHRYSANT, SG ;
GRAFF, A ;
KUPIEC, JW ;
HSU, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 35 (11) :1060-1066
[5]   A MULTIFACTORIAL TRIAL DESIGN TO ASSESS COMBINATION THERAPY IN HYPERTENSION - TREATMENT WITH BISOPROLOL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE [J].
FRISHMAN, WH ;
BRYZINSKI, BS ;
COULSON, LR ;
DEQUATTRO, VL ;
VLACHAKIS, ND ;
MROCZEK, WJ ;
DUKART, G ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
ALEMAYEHU, D ;
KOURY, K .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (13) :1461-1468
[6]  
Furberg CD, 2000, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V283, P1967
[7]   Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension [J].
Gradman, AH ;
Cutler, NR ;
Davis, PJ ;
Robbins, JA ;
Weiss, RJ ;
Wood, BC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :431-435
[8]   Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension:: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study [J].
Hansson, L ;
Hedner, T ;
Lund-Johansen, P ;
Kjeldsen, SE ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Syvertsen, JO ;
Lanke, J ;
de Faire, U ;
Dahlöf, B ;
Karlberg, BE .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :359-365
[9]   Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension:: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial [J].
Hansson, L ;
Lindholm, LH ;
Niskanen, L ;
Lanke, J ;
Hedner, T ;
Niklason, A ;
Luomanmäki, K ;
Dahlöf, B ;
de Faire, U ;
Mörlin, C ;
Karlberg, BE ;
Wester, PO ;
Björck, JE .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9153) :611-616
[10]   Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:: principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial [J].
Hansson, L ;
Zanchetti, A ;
Carruthers, SG ;
Dahlöf, B ;
Elmfeldt, D ;
Julius, S ;
Ménard, J ;
Rahn, KH ;
Wedel, H ;
Westerling, S .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9118) :1755-1762