Uncertainty, institutions and regulatory responses to emerging technologies:CRISPRGene editing in theUSand theEU(2012-2019)

被引:11
作者
Asquer, Alberto [1 ]
Krachkovskaya, Inna [2 ]
机构
[1] SOAS Univ London, Sch Finance & Management, Publ Policy & Management, Thornhaugh St,Russell Sq, London WC1H 0XG, England
[2] SOAS Univ London, Sch Finance & Management, London, England
关键词
CRISPR; emerging technology; regulatory institution; uncertainty; DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CRISPR; GENE; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; GARBAGE; MODEL; RISK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/rego.12335
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This study aims to improve theoretical accounts of regulatory responses to emerging technologies by proposing a model of regulatory development, which incorporates a role for types of uncertainty and for existing regulatory institutions. Differently from existing theories of regulatory development, the model proposed here posits a sequence of cyclical activities where regulatory responses arise in incremental fashion out of efforts to make sense of emerging technologies and to ponder the applicability of existing regulatory tools. The model is discussed on the basis of the comparison between regulatory responses to the emergence of CRISPR gene editing in the US and the EU in the period 2012-2019. The comparison between the two cases suggests how regulatory responses to emerging technologies are affected by expectations of future technological and regulatory developments and by existing regulatory institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1127
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]  
EU Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, 2016, 20152225INI EU COMM
[32]  
Executive Office of the US President, 2019, EX ORD MOD REG FRAM
[33]   Regulating human control over autonomous systems [J].
Firlej, Mikolaj ;
Taeihagh, Araz .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2021, 15 (04) :1071-1091
[34]   Five misunderstandings about case-study research [J].
Flyvbjerg, B .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2006, 12 (02) :219-245
[35]  
Gallo ME, 2017, ADV GENE EDITING CRI
[36]   European Court of Justice ruling regarding new genetic engineering methods scientifically justified: a commentary on the biased reporting about the recent ruling [J].
Gelinsky, Eva ;
Hilbeck, Angelika .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2018, 30
[37]  
Grant EV, 2016, FOOD DRUG LAW J, V71, P608
[38]   CRISPR'd babies: human germline genome editing in the 'He Jiankui affair' [J].
Greely, Henry T. .
JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2019, 6 (01) :111-183
[39]  
Gutmann A, 2018, FOREIGN AFF, V97, P171
[40]  
Gutmann A, 2011, HASTINGS CENT REP, V41, P17