Violations of rational choice principles in pricing decisions

被引:37
作者
Hinterhuber, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Hinterhuber & Partners, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Pricing; Behavioral economics; Violations of rationality; Purchasing criteria; Price setting; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; REFERENCE PRICES; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED QUALITY; MARKETING ACTIONS; ENDINGS; IMPACT; CUSTOMER; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on behavioral and psychological aspects of pricing is concerned with violations of rationality. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the current literature by highlighting those studies that have specific relevance for industrial pricing. I hereby examine two different perspectives. First, by taking the customer perspective, I analyze under which circumstances customer purchase decisions violate basic principles of rational choice. Second, by taking the perspective of managers, I examine which biases affect the process of price setting within firms. This overview meaningfully advances industrial pricing theory and practice: It allows both customers and managers to guard themselves against widely diffused traps in decision making. It also enables managers to favorably influence customer perceptions of value and price without actually changing the price. Finally, by pulling together a number of different research areas into a more parsimonious framework and a tighter narrative, this framework offers systematic directions for future research. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 74
页数:10
相关论文
共 119 条
[81]   Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics [J].
Mousavi, Shabnam ;
Gigerenzer, Gerd .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (08) :1671-1678
[82]  
Nagle Thomas., 2002, STRATEGY TACTICS PRI, VThird
[83]   Incidental prices and their effect on willingness to pay [J].
Nunes, JC ;
Boatwright, P .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2004, 41 (04) :457-466
[84]   How to Make a 29% Increase Look Bigger: The Unit Effect in Option Comparisons [J].
Pandelaere, Mario ;
Briers, Barbara ;
Lembregts, Christophe .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (02) :308-322
[85]   New product pricing strategy under customer asymmetric anchoring [J].
Park, Joo Heon ;
MacLachlan, Douglas L. ;
Love, Edwin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2011, 28 (04) :309-318
[86]   Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness [J].
Plassmann, Hilke ;
O'Doherty, John ;
Shiv, Baba ;
Rangel, Antonio .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (03) :1050-1054
[87]  
Poundstone William., 2010, Priceless: The Myth of Fair Value (and How to Take Advantage of It)
[88]   Are Men Seduced by Red? The Effect of Red Versus Black Prices on Price Perceptions [J].
Puccinelli, Nancy M. ;
Chandrashekaran, Rajesh ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
Suri, Rajneesh .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2013, 89 (02) :115-125
[89]   THE EFFECT OF PRICE, BRAND NAME, AND STORE NAME ON BUYERS PERCEPTIONS OF PRODUCT QUALITY - AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW [J].
RAO, AR ;
MONROE, KB .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (03) :351-357
[90]   Anchoring in simulated competitive market negotiation [J].
Ritov, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :16-25