Democratizing Flexible Endoscopy Training: Noninferiority Randomized Trial Comparing a Box-Trainer vs a Virtual Reality Simulator to Prepare for the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery Exam

被引:1
|
作者
Mascagni, Pietro [1 ,2 ]
Spota, Andrea [3 ,4 ]
Pizzicannella, Margherita [2 ]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo [3 ]
Svendrovski, Anton [5 ]
Fiorillo, Claudio [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Sun Gyo [2 ]
Pool, Marinka Oudkerk [2 ]
Dallemagne, Bernard [2 ,3 ]
Marescaux, Jacques [3 ]
Swanstrom, Lee [2 ]
Shlomovitz, Eran [2 ]
Perretta, Silvana [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[2] IHU, Inst Image Guided Surg, Strasbourg, France
[3] Res Inst Digest Canc, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Milan, Scuola Specializzaz Chirurg Gen, Milan, Italy
[5] UZIK Consulting Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
SKILLS; CURRICULUM; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000157
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A considerable number of surgical residents fail the mandated endoscopy exam despite having completed the required clinical cases. Low-cost endoscopy box trainers (BTs) could democratize training; however, their effectiveness has never been compared with higher-cost virtual reality simulators (VRSs). STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized noninferiority trial, endoscopy novices trained either on the VRS used in the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery manual skills (FESms) exam or a validated BT-the Basic Endoscopic Skills Training (BEST) box. Trainees were tested at fixed timepoints on the FESms and on standardized ex vivo models. The primary endpoint was FESms improvement at 1 week. Secondary endpoints were FESms improvement at 2 weeks, FESms pass rates, ex vivo tests performance, and trainees' feedback. RESULTS: Seventy-seven trainees completed the study. VRS and BT trainees showed comparable FESms improvements (25.16 +/- 14.29 vs 25.58 +/- 11.75 FESms points, respectively; p = 0.89), FESms pass rates (76.32% vs 61.54%, respectively; p = 0.16) and total ex vivo tasks completion times (365.76 +/- 237.56 vs 322.68 +/- 186.04 seconds, respectively; p = 0.55) after 1 week. Performances were comparable also after 2 weeks of training, but FESms pass rates increased significantly only in the first week. Trainees were significantly more satisfied with the BT platform (3.97 +/- 1.20 vs 4.81 +/- 0.40 points on a 5-point Likert scale for the VRS and the BT, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training is an effective means to develop competency in endoscopy, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. Low-cost BTs like the BEST box compare well with high-tech VRSs and could help democratize endoscopy training. (C) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1210
页数:10
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Learning Basic Laparoscopic Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Box Trainer, Virtual Reality Simulator, and Mental Training
    Mulla, Mubashir
    Sharma, Davendra
    Moghul, Masood
    Kailani, Obeda
    Dockery, Judith
    Ayis, Salma
    Grange, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (02) : 190 - 195