共 1 条
Democratizing Flexible Endoscopy Training: Noninferiority Randomized Trial Comparing a Box-Trainer vs a Virtual Reality Simulator to Prepare for the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery Exam
被引:1
|作者:
Mascagni, Pietro
[1
,2
]
Spota, Andrea
[3
,4
]
Pizzicannella, Margherita
[2
]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo
[3
]
Svendrovski, Anton
[5
]
Fiorillo, Claudio
[1
,2
]
Lim, Sun Gyo
[2
]
Pool, Marinka Oudkerk
[2
]
Dallemagne, Bernard
[2
,3
]
Marescaux, Jacques
[3
]
Swanstrom, Lee
[2
]
Shlomovitz, Eran
[2
]
Perretta, Silvana
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[2] IHU, Inst Image Guided Surg, Strasbourg, France
[3] Res Inst Digest Canc, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Milan, Scuola Specializzaz Chirurg Gen, Milan, Italy
[5] UZIK Consulting Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词:
SKILLS;
CURRICULUM;
PERFORMANCE;
VALIDATION;
RETENTION;
D O I:
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000157
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND: A considerable number of surgical residents fail the mandated endoscopy exam despite having completed the required clinical cases. Low-cost endoscopy box trainers (BTs) could democratize training; however, their effectiveness has never been compared with higher-cost virtual reality simulators (VRSs). STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized noninferiority trial, endoscopy novices trained either on the VRS used in the Fundamental of Endoscopic Surgery manual skills (FESms) exam or a validated BT-the Basic Endoscopic Skills Training (BEST) box. Trainees were tested at fixed timepoints on the FESms and on standardized ex vivo models. The primary endpoint was FESms improvement at 1 week. Secondary endpoints were FESms improvement at 2 weeks, FESms pass rates, ex vivo tests performance, and trainees' feedback. RESULTS: Seventy-seven trainees completed the study. VRS and BT trainees showed comparable FESms improvements (25.16 +/- 14.29 vs 25.58 +/- 11.75 FESms points, respectively; p = 0.89), FESms pass rates (76.32% vs 61.54%, respectively; p = 0.16) and total ex vivo tasks completion times (365.76 +/- 237.56 vs 322.68 +/- 186.04 seconds, respectively; p = 0.55) after 1 week. Performances were comparable also after 2 weeks of training, but FESms pass rates increased significantly only in the first week. Trainees were significantly more satisfied with the BT platform (3.97 +/- 1.20 vs 4.81 +/- 0.40 points on a 5-point Likert scale for the VRS and the BT, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training is an effective means to develop competency in endoscopy, especially at the beginning of the learning curve. Low-cost BTs like the BEST box compare well with high-tech VRSs and could help democratize endoscopy training. (C) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1210
页数:10
相关论文