Standards for clinical trials in sexual dysfunctions of women: Research designs and outcomes assessment

被引:11
作者
Heiman, Julia R.
Guess, Marsha K.
Connell, Kathleen
Melman, Arnold
Shibley Hyde, Janet
Segraves, R. Taylor
Wyllie, Michael G.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Urol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, MHMC Psychait, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
drug development; clinical pharmacology; clinical drug studies in sexual dysfunction; outcome efficacy assessments; daily diaries; per event questionnaires; libido disorders; arousal disorders; orgasm disorders;
D O I
10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10114.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. Clinical trials on sexual dysfunctions in women are limited in spite of the fact that sexual dysfunctions are likely more common in women than in men. Currently there are no medications approved for treatment in women, and limited data on drug efficacy or psychological efficacy in well-controlled studies. Aim. To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for the research design and outcome assessment standards for clinical trials in women's sexual dysfunctions. Methods. An International Consultation in collaboration with the major urology and sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various male and female sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. Concerning the Standards for Clinical Trials in Women's Sexual Dysfunctions Committee, there were seven experts from two countries. Main Outcome Measure. Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate. Results. A comprehensive update was created which included references and recommended guidelines for rationale and design of clinical trials, study populations, outcome assessments, protocol design and implementation, data analysis and reporting, as well as ethical and clinical issues related to sexual dysfunction research. Conclusions. There is a need for more research in developing standards to be used when performing clinical trials and outcomes assessment research in sexual dysfunctions of women.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.744053, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[2]  
Bancroft J, 1998, INT J IMPOT RES, V10, pS4
[3]   Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications [J].
Basson, R ;
Berman, J ;
Burnett, A ;
Derogatis, L ;
Ferguson, D ;
Fourcroy, J ;
Goldstein, I ;
Graziottin, A ;
Heiman, J ;
Laan, E ;
Leiblum, S ;
Padma-Nathan, H ;
Rosen, R ;
Segraves, K ;
Segraves, RT ;
Shabsigh, R ;
Sipski, M ;
Wagner, G ;
Whipple, B .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) :888-893
[4]  
BROTTO L, 2002, ANN M INT SOC STUD W
[5]   Clinical trial development in female sexual dysfunction [J].
Ferguson, DM .
JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2002, 28 :77-83
[6]   Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures [J].
Garratt, AN ;
Schmidt, L ;
Mackintosh, A ;
Fitzpatrick, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7351) :1417-1419
[7]  
Keppel G., 1982, DESIGN ANAL RES HDB
[8]   Sexual dysfunction in the United States - Prevalence and predictors [J].
Laumann, EO ;
Paik, A ;
Rosen, RC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (06) :537-544
[9]   Sexual function problems and help seeking behaviour in Britain: national probability sample survey [J].
Mercer, CH ;
Fenton, KA ;
Johnson, AM ;
Wellings, K ;
Macdowall, W ;
McManus, S ;
Nanchahal, K ;
Erens, B .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7412) :426-427
[10]   Health-related quality of life - A guide for the health professional [J].
Nanda, U ;
Andresen, EM .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1998, 21 (02) :179-215