Effect of Harvest Time and Frequency on Biomass Quality and Biomethane Potential of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) Under Paludiculture Conditions

被引:31
作者
Dragoni, Federico [1 ]
Giannini, Vittoria [1 ]
Ragaglini, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Bonari, Enrico [1 ,2 ]
Silvestri, Nicola [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Inst Life Sci, Pzza Martiri Liberta 33, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] CRIBE, Via Vecchia Livornese 748, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Pisa, Dept Agr Food & Environm, Via Borghetto 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
关键词
Biogas; Anaerobic digestion; Perennial grasses; Fiber components; Digestion kinetics; Peatland cultivation; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; METHANE YIELD; ENERGY CROPS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; COMMUNIS TRIN; ARUNDO-DONAX; EX STEUDEL; MODEL; L;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-017-9866-z
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study examined the effect of harvest time (from May to September) and dry matter partitioning on biomethane potential and methane yield per unit area of Phragmites australis cultivation under paludiculture conditions. The experimental site is part of a larger experimental platform (San Niccol, Pisa) located within the Massaciuccoli Lake Basin in Central Italy (Tuscany, IT). The study also took into account the double cut strategy by evaluating the regrowth from June to September. Biomethane potentials ranged from 384 to 315 and from 412 to 283 NL CH4 kg VS-1 (normal liters of methane per kg of volatile solids) for leaves and stems, respectively. About digestion kinetics, maximum daily production rate (R (max)) was significantly affected by harvest time and not by plant partitioning. Along the harvest season, biomethane yield per unit area was mostly driven by the biomass yield showing an increasing trend from May (1659 Nm(3) ha(-1)) to September (3817 Nm(3) ha(-1)). The highest value was obtained with the double harvest option (4383 Nm(3) ha(-1)), although it was not statistically different from the single harvest carried out in September. Owing to its remarkably lower yields, P. australis cannot be considered along the same lines as crops conventionally used for biogas production, but it may represent an interesting option for paludiculture cropping systems by coupling peatland restoration with bioenergy production. September harvest management seemed the most feasible option, although further investigation on crop lifespan is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1078
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abel Susanne, 2013, Plant Diversity and Evolution, V130, P219, DOI 10.1127/1869-6155/2013/0130-0070
[2]   An above-ground biomass production model for a common reed (Phragmites communis Trin) stand [J].
Allirand, JM ;
Gosse, G .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1995, 9 (06) :441-448
[3]   Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield [J].
Amon, Thomas ;
Amon, Barbara ;
Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy ;
Zollitsch, Werner ;
Mayer, Karl ;
Gruber, Leonhard .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :173-182
[4]   Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays [J].
Angelidaki, I. ;
Alves, M. ;
Bolzonella, D. ;
Borzacconi, L. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Guwy, A. J. ;
Kalyuzhnyi, S. ;
Jenicek, P. ;
van Lier, J. B. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :927-934
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOIL TAX BAS SYST SO, V2nd, pWashington
[6]  
APHA, 2005, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
[7]   Accumulation of nutrients and heavy metals in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel and Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla in a constructed wetland of the Venice lagoon watershed [J].
Bragato, Claudia ;
Brix, Hans ;
Malagoli, Mario .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2006, 144 (03) :967-975
[8]   Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands using vegetation as a proxy [J].
Couwenberg, John ;
Thiele, Annett ;
Tanneberger, Franziska ;
Augustin, Juergen ;
Baerisch, Susanne ;
Dubovik, Dimitry ;
Liashchynskaya, Nadzeya ;
Michaelis, Dierk ;
Minke, Merten ;
Skuratovich, Arkadi ;
Joosten, Hans .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2011, 674 (01) :67-89
[9]  
de Mendiburu F., 2019, AGRICOLAE STAT PROCE, DOI DOI 10.1038/S41598-021-86578-4
[10]  
Dubrovskis V., 2012, BIOGAS PRODUCTION PO