Clinical evaluation of refractive changes following brow suspension surgery in pediatric patients with congenital blepharoptosis

被引:14
作者
Kumar, S [1 ]
Chaudhuri, Z [1 ]
Chauhan, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delhi, Maulana Azad Med Coll, Guru Nanak Eye Ctr, New Delhi 110021, India
关键词
D O I
10.3928/1542-8877-20050501-08
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative visual acuity and refractive changes occurring after bilateral frontalis brow suspension surgery in pediatric patients with congenital blepharoptosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients between 4 and 12 years old with severe congenital blepharoptosis (unilateral in 21 cases and bilateral in 2 cases; total of 25 eyes) and poor levator function underwent bilateral frontalis brow suspension surgery by Crawford's double triangle method with 4:0 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. The non-ptotic eyes (21 eyes) undergoing frontalis brow suspension surgery served as the control group. All patients had best-corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA) of more than 6/9 preoperatively in both eyes. Changes in the postoperative BCSVA, binocularity, relevant refractive parameters, lid position, lagophthalmos, lid lag, and tear break-up time were evaluated in both groups for 12 weeks and appropriate statistical tests were applied. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the baseline characteristics and the postoperative changes in the eyes with and without ptosis. However, these were found to be transient and did not result in any new cases of amblyopia postoperatively. No complications requiring revision of surgery were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in the BCSVA after frontalis brow suspension surgery are transient. Retmoscopy, manual keratometry, and corneal videokeratoscopy are simple and effective methods to evaluate the sequential refractive changes occurring in these eyes.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 227
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Baiyeroju A M, 2003, West Afr J Med, V22, P208
[2]   Evaluating data acquisition and smoothing functions of currently available videokeratoscopes [J].
Belin, MW ;
Ratliff, CD .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 (04) :421-426
[3]  
BENEISH R, 1983, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V18, P127
[4]   CLASSIFICATION OF NORMAL CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY BASED ON COMPUTER-ASSISTED VIDEOKERATOGRAPHY [J].
BOGAN, SJ ;
WARING, GO ;
IBRAHIM, O ;
DREWS, C ;
CURTIS, L .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (07) :945-949
[5]   Prospective analysis of changes in corneal topography after upper eyelid surgery [J].
Brown, MS ;
Siegel, IM ;
Lisman, RD .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 15 (06) :378-383
[6]  
CADERA W, 1992, J PEDIATR OPHTHALMOL, V29, P85
[8]  
Cohen EJ, 1999, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V106, P1628
[9]  
CRAWFORD JS, 1977, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V8, P31
[10]  
Fiergang DL, 1999, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V36, P74