Air-fluidized therapy in the treatment of severe burns: A retrospective study from a burn intensive care unit in Austria

被引:5
作者
Nickl, Stefanie [1 ]
Fochtmann-Frana, Alexandra [1 ]
Nedomansky, Jakob [1 ]
Hitzl, Wolfgang [2 ,3 ]
Kamolz, Lars-Peter [4 ,5 ]
Haslik, Werner [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Res Off Biostat, Salzburg, Austria
[3] Paracelsus Med Univ Salzburg, Dept Ophthalmol & Optometry, Salzburg, Austria
[4] Med Univ Graz, Dept Surg, Div Plast Aesthet & Reconstruct Surg, Graz, Austria
[5] Joanneum Res Forsch Gesell MbH, COREMED Ctr Regenerat Med, Graz, Austria
关键词
Burn; posterior trunk; air-fluidized therapy; outcome; BED;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Air-fluidized therapy (AFT) has long been used in the treatment of severe burns. In patients with extensive burns involving the posterior trunk, we aim to keep affected posterior areas dry and to postpone their treatment, initially applying available split-thickness skin grafts in functionally more important regions. We retrospectively assessed the impact of AFT on the survival of patients treated in the burn intensive care unit (ICU) of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 2003 and 2016. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients aged >= 18 years with burned total body surface area (TBSA) >= 20% and IIb-III degrees thermal injuries on the posterior trunk who received AFT. Survival rates were compared with those predicted by the abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed. Results: Seventy-five of 110 patients with posterior trunk burns received AFT. Their survival rate exceeded that predicted by the ABSI score (mean ABSI, 10.0 +/- 2.0; 73.3% (95% CI: 62-83%) survival rate vs. 20-40% predicted; p < 0.0001); no such difference was observed in the non-AFT group (mean, 8.8 +/- 1.9; 65.7% (95% CI: 48-81%) survival rate vs. 50-70% predicted). Patients receiving AFT had significantly greater TBSA (median, 50% (35-60) vs. 30% (25-45) and longer ICU stays (median, 63 (36-92) vs. 18 (9-52) days; both p < 0.0001). Fifty-one (68.0%) patients in the AFT group and 26 (74.3%) patients in the non-AFT group underwent posterior trunk surgery (p = 0.66) a median of 16 (10-26) and 5 (2.5-9.5) days, respectively, after admission (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients receiving AFT had significantly better survival than predicted by ABSI score in contrast to patients not receiving AFT although burn injuries in this group were more severe (greater TBSA, higher ABSI). As intensive care was similar in these groups aside from AFT, the better survival could be attributed to this additional therapy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 142
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   AIR-FLUIDIZED BEDS OR CONVENTIONAL THERAPY FOR PRESSURE SORES - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
ALLMAN, RM ;
WALKER, JM ;
HART, MK ;
LAPRADE, CA ;
NOEL, LB ;
SMITH, CR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 107 (05) :641-648
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT WOUND J
[3]   NURSING BURNS ON SPECIAL BEDS - PRACTICAL NOTE [J].
BARKER, SM ;
CRANE, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1987, 21 (03) :331-332
[4]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE AIR-FLUIDIZED BED IN A GENERAL PLASTIC-SURGERY UNIT [J].
BOORMAN, JG ;
CARR, S ;
KEMBLE, JVH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1981, 34 (02) :165-168
[5]   Bacterial and fungal colonization of burn wounds [J].
de Macedo, JLS ;
Santos, JB .
MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ, 2005, 100 (05) :535-539
[6]  
Fleck Cynthia A, 2010, J Am Col Certif Wound Spec, V2, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.jcws.2010.02.002
[7]   30 years later-Does the ABSI need revision? [J].
Forster, Natasha A. ;
Zingg, Matthias ;
Haile, Sarah R. ;
Kuenzi, Walter ;
Giovanoli, Pietro ;
Guggenheim, Merlin .
BURNS, 2011, 37 (06) :958-963
[8]  
Gacto-Sanchez P, 2017, MED INTENSIVA, V41, P356, DOI [10.1016/j.medin.2017.02.008, 10.1016/j.medine.2017.02.015]
[9]  
Hargest T S, 1969, AORN J, V10, P50, DOI 10.1016/S0001-2092(08)70643-4
[10]  
Hermans Michel H E, 2005, Int Wound J, V2, P206, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00129.x