Identity theory and personality theory: Mutual relevance

被引:97
作者
Stryker, Sheldon [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Sociol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00468.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Some personality psychologists have found a structural symbolic interactionist frame and identity theory relevant to their work. This frame and theory, developed in sociology, are first reviewed. Emphasized in the review are a multiple identity conception of self, identities as internalized expectations derived from roles embedded in organized networks of social interaction, and a view of social structures as facilitators in bringing people into networks or constraints in keeping them out, subsequently, attention turns to a discussion of the mutual relevance of structural symbolic interactionism/identity theory and personality theory, looking to extensions of the current literature on these topics.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1102
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Anderson, 1989, SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIE, P35
[2]  
Bird C., 1940, SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[3]  
Blumer H., 1986, SYMB INTERACT
[4]  
Bryson Gladys, 1945, Man and Society: The Scottish Inquiry of the Eighteenth
[5]  
Cooley C., 1902, Human nature and the social Order
[6]  
Dewey J., 1922, Human nature and conduct
[7]   THE DIVIDED SELF - CONCURRENT AND LONGITUDINAL EFFECTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT AND SOCIAL ROLES ON SELF-CONCEPT DIFFERENTIATION [J].
DONAHUE, EM ;
ROBINS, RW ;
ROBERTS, BW ;
JOHN, OP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 64 (05) :834-846
[8]  
ERWIN LH, 2001, EXTENDING SELF ESTEE, P29
[9]  
Heise DavidR., 1979, UNDERSTANDING EVENTS
[10]  
Hochschild AR, 2012, MANAGED HEART: COMMERCIALIZATION OF HUMAN FEELING, P1