Does environmental regulation induce improved financial development for green technological innovation in China?

被引:126
作者
Zhou, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Du, Juntao [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Appl Math, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Financial development; Environmental regulation; Biased technological progress; Sustainable development goals; Green finance; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; POLLUTION PREVENTION; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; STRATEGY; FDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113685
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of environmental regulations on the nexus between financial development and biased technological innovation is a prerequisite for optimizing systems of environmental and financial policies to gain sustainable development goals (SDGs) in emerging markets. Drawing on China's city-level data from 2003 to 2018, we established econometric models and obtained the following empirical results. Financial development (FD) can promote energy- and environmental-biased technological progress, but, owing to the inverted U-shaped relationship, economic development, and resource endowment, the impact that FD has on biased technological progress is heterogeneous; unreasonable FD will also hinder green technological progress. Threshold model shows that with the improvement of environmental regulation, the impact of energy- and environmental-biased technological progress is also increasing. The development of green finance under SDGs is an important driving force in green technological progress. Finally, we offer suggestions to optimize environmental and financial policymaking and implementation from a government intervention perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Transition to Clean Technology [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Hanley, Douglas ;
Kerr, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :52-104
[2]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[3]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[4]   Climate change and knowledge spillovers for cleaner production: New insights [J].
Aldieri, Luigi ;
Vinci, Concetto Paolo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
[5]   Financial development and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa: Is there a technology effect? [J].
Aluko, Olufemi Adewale ;
Obalade, Adefemi A. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 747
[6]  
Arimura T.H., 2007, SOPHIA EC REV, V52, P1
[7]   Pollution prevention strategy: a study of Indian firms [J].
Bhupendra, Kumar Verma ;
Sangle, Shirish .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 133 :795-802
[8]   What drives successful implementation of pollution prevention and cleaner technology strategy? The role of innovative capability [J].
Bhupendra, Kumar Verma ;
Sangle, Shirish .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 155 :184-192
[9]   The relationship between environmental management performance and financial performance of firms listed in the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK [J].
Boakye, Danquah Jeff ;
Tingbani, Ishmael ;
Ahinful, Gabriel Sam ;
Nsor-Ambala, Randolph .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
[10]   Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China [J].
Bu, Maoliang ;
Qiao, Zhenzi ;
Liu, Beibei .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 89 :10-18