Globalization of businesses raises major questions about the regulation of corporations, both in the national and international context. The debate is marked by two competing views. The 'hyperglobalists' claim that in a globalized world, nation-states cannot take effective actions to regulate multinational businesses, especially those relating to banking and finance. In response, the 'skeptics' accept the view that to regulate corporations, the nation-state has always had to restructure itself. However. they challenge the contention that globalization has reduced the power, functions and authority of the state. The paper contributes to the debate through an examination of some of the processes leading to the forced closure land the aftermath) of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), a bank that operated from 73 countries. It particularly focuses upon the role of the banking regulators and their reliance upon auditing technologies to regulate major banks. The paper sides with the 'skeptics' and argues that the nation states. especially major Western states, remain important players in the regulation of global businesses. It concludes that the nation-state's capacity to regulate global enterprises is compromised by history. domestic concerns and relationships with class acid capitalist interests rather than by globalization per se. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
