The dynamics of predation risk assessment: responses of anuran larvae to chemical cues of predators

被引:63
作者
Fraker, Michael E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48169 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
information use; non-lethal interaction; trait-mediated interaction;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01386.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1.While the antipredator behaviour of prey has been well studied, little is known about the rules governing the predation risk assessment of prey. In this study, I measured the activity levels of predator-naive green frog (Rana clamitans) tadpoles during and after exposures to the chemical cue of predatory larval dragonflies (Anax spp.). I then used the lengths of the time lags from the end of the cue exposures until the tadpoles returned to a control level of activity as an index of the perceived risk of the tadpoles. 2. While tadpoles always responded upon exposure to the Anax chemical cue by strongly reducing their activity level, their perceived risk increased asymptotically over time during the initial period of the cue exposure. Tadpoles of all size classes perceived increasing risk in proportion to chemical cue concentration, but the length of time that tadpoles responded during cue exposure and the length of their post-exposure time lags decreased with increasing body mass. 3. The results suggest that the perceived risk of green frog tadpoles varies over time and does not correspond directly to their behavioural response (i.e. activity level). However, their perceived risk does appear to vary in accordance with the predation risk associated with the Anax chemical cue and the reliability of the information from the cue, and therefore may be predictable.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 645
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
2
[22]   Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences [J].
Schoeppner, NM ;
Relyea, RA .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (05) :505-512
[23]   New insights on how temporal variation in predation risk shapes prey behavior [J].
Sih, A ;
Ziemba, R ;
Harding, KC .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (01) :3-4
[24]   PREY UNCERTAINTY AND THE BALANCING OF ANTIPREDATOR AND FEEDING NEEDS [J].
SIH, A .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 139 (05) :1052-1069
[25]   Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment [J].
Stankowich, T ;
Blumstein, DT .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1581) :2627-2634
[26]   Optimizing time and resource allocation trade-offs for investment into morphological and behavioral defense [J].
Steiner, Ulrich K. ;
Pfeiffer, Thomas .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2007, 169 (01) :118-129
[27]  
Turner AM, 2003, ECOLOGY, V84, P616, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0616:SATSOP]2.0.CO
[28]  
2
[29]  
Van Buskirk J, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1580, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1580:DROAID]2.0.CO
[30]  
2