Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and pig manure with different mixing ratios

被引:49
作者
Tian, Hailin [1 ]
Duan, Na [1 ]
Lin, Cong [1 ]
Li, Xue [1 ]
Zhong, Mingzhu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Water Resources & Civil Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Co-digestion; Kitchen waste; Pig manure; Different ratios; FOOD-WASTE; METHANE PRODUCTION; FATTY-ACID; ORGANIC FRACTION; VEGETABLE WASTE; DAIRY MANURE; SWINE MANURE; INHIBITION; AMMONIA; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.11.017
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste (KW) and pig manure (PM) with seven different PM to KW total solids (TS) ratios of 1:0, 5:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 1:5 and 0:1 was conducted at mesophilic temperature (35 +/- 1 degrees C) to investigate the feasibility and process performance. The co-digestion of PM and KW was found to be an available way to enhance methane production compared with solo-digestion of PM or KW. The ratio of PM to KW of 1:1 got the highest biodegradability (BDA) of 85.03% and a methane yield of 409.5 mL/gVS. For the co-digestion of KW and PM, there was no obvious inhibition of ammonia nitrogen because it was in an acceptable range from 1380 mg/L to 2020 mg/L in the whole process. However, severe methane inhibition and long lag phase due to the accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) was observed while the KW content was over 50%, and in the lag phase, propionic acid and butyric acid made up the major constituents of the total VFAs. The technical digestion time (T-80: the time it takes to produce 80% of the digester's maximum gas production) of the above 7 ratios was 15, 21, 22, 27, 49, 62 and 61 days, respectively. In this study, a mixing ratio of 1:1 for PM and KW was found to maximize BDA and methane yield, provided a short digestion time and stable digestion performance and was therefore recommended for further study and engineering application. (C) 2014, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association, 2005, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[2]  
ANTHONISEN AC, 1976, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V48, P835
[3]   Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate [J].
Astals, S. ;
Nolla-Ardevol, V. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 110 :63-70
[4]   Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition [J].
Bouallagui, H. ;
Lahdheb, H. ;
Ben Romdan, E. ;
Rachdi, B. ;
Hamdi, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) :1844-1849
[5]  
BRAUN R, 1981, BIOTECHNOL LETT, V3, P159
[6]   The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure [J].
Chae, K. J. ;
Jang, Am ;
Yim, S. K. ;
Kim, In S. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (01) :1-6
[7]  
Chen L., 2011, T CHINESE SOC AGR EN, V27, P91
[8]   BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL AND SOLID-STATE ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF KOREAN FOOD WASTES [J].
CHO, JK ;
PARK, SC ;
CHANG, HN .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 52 (03) :245-253
[9]   The effects of change in volatile fatty acid (VFA) composition on methanogenic upflow filter reactor (UFAF) performance [J].
Demirel, B ;
Yenigün, O .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 23 (10) :1179-1187
[10]   INHIBITION OF THE FERMENTATION OF PROPIONATE TO METHANE BY HYDROGEN, ACETATE, AND PROPIONATE [J].
FUKUZAKI, S ;
NISHIO, N ;
SHOBAYASHI, M ;
NAGAI, S .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 56 (03) :719-723