How Do Communication Cues Change Impressions of Human-Robot Touch Interaction?

被引:30
|
作者
Hirano, Takahiro [1 ,2 ]
Shiomi, Masahiro [1 ]
Iio, Takamasa [1 ,3 ]
Kimoto, Mitsuhiko [1 ,2 ]
Tanev, Ivan [2 ]
Shimohara, Katsunori [2 ]
Hagita, Norihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] ATR, Intelligent Robot & Commun Labs, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Keihanna Sci City, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Doshisha Univ, 1-3 Tatara Miyakodani, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Human-robot interaction; Haptic interaction; Touch; Communication cue; INTERPERSONAL TOUCH; SUPPORT; STRESS;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-017-0425-8
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Communication cues, e.g., gaze behaviors and touch styles, are essential factors in the close interaction of people with social robots. Even though the communication cues are broadly investigated in human-robot interaction, it remain unknown how they change human impressions of social robots in haptic interaction situations. For better understanding of communication cues in human-robot touch interaction, we conducted an experiment with 28 participants who interacted with a robot with gaze behaviors and touch styles. We prepared two gaze behaviors and three touch styles based on past research works. Our experimental results showed that participants preferred a gaze behavior more that only looks at their faces during a touch than a gaze behavior that looks at their faces, hands and returns to their face. They also preferred a touch style in which they touched the robot more than touch styles where a robot touches them.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 31
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Textile Pressure Mapping Sensor for Emotional Touch Detection in Human-Robot Interaction
    Zhou, Bo
    Altamirano, Carlos Andres Velez
    Zurian, Heber Cruz
    Atefi, Seyed Reza
    Billing, Erik
    Martinez, Fernando Seoane
    Lukowicz, Paul
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (11)
  • [22] Subtle Reaction and Response Time Effects in Human-Robot Touch
    Shiomi, Masahiro
    Minato, Takashi
    Ishiguro, Hiroshi
    SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2017, 2017, 10652 : 242 - 251
  • [23] Horse as Teacher: How human-horse interaction informs human-robot interaction
    Jain, Eakta
    Gardner-McCune, Christina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023), 2023,
  • [24] How to include User eXperience in the design of Human-Robot Interaction
    Prati, Elisa
    Peruzzini, Margherita
    Pellicciari, Marcello
    Raffaeli, Roberto
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2021, 68
  • [25] How Can Physiological Computing Benefit Human-Robot Interaction?
    Roy, Raphaelle N.
    Drougard, Nicolas
    Gateau, Thibault
    Dehais, Frederic
    Chanel, Caroline P. C.
    ROBOTICS, 2020, 9 (04) : 1 - 24
  • [26] Models of Human Behavior for Human-Robot Interaction and Automated Driving: How Accurate Do the Models of Human Behavior Need to Be?
    Markkula, Gustav
    Dogar, Mehmet R.
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2024, 31 (03) : 115 - 120
  • [27] How culture modulates anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Interaction: A review
    Roselli, Cecilia
    Lapomarda, Leonardo
    Datteri, Edoardo
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2025, 255
  • [28] The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature
    Steve Yohanan
    Karon E. MacLean
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2012, 4 : 163 - 180
  • [29] On Interaction Quality in Human-Robot Interaction
    Bensch, Suna
    Jevtic, Aleksandar
    Hellstrom, Thomas
    ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 1, 2017, : 182 - 189
  • [30] The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature
    Yohanan, Steve
    MacLean, Karon E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2012, 4 (02) : 163 - 180