The role of global economic policy uncertainty in predicting crude oil futures volatility: Evidence from a two-factor GARCH-MIDAS model

被引:23
作者
Dai, Peng-Fei [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xiong [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jin [4 ]
Zhou, Wei-Xing [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Lab Computat & Analyt Complex Management Syst CACM, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[4] China Bohai Bank Co LTD, Tianjin 300012, Peoples R China
[5] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Math, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[6] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Econophys, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[7] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, POB 114,130 Meilong Rd, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil futures; Global economic policy uncertainty; Volatility forecasting; GARCH-MIDAS; Two-factor model; MARKET VOLATILITY; STOCK; MATTER; GOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102849
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The fluctuations in global policy affect the volatility of international crude oil markets. It is quite meaningful to analyze the impact of policy uncertainty on crude oil market volatility from a global integration perspective in deep. This paper aims to examine whether the global uncertainty of economic policy (GEPU) and the uncertainty of uncertainty (GEPU change) have different impacts on crude oil futures volatility. We establish two types of models under the GARCH-MIDAS framework, single-factor model and two-factor model, for discussing their explanatory and predictive power when considering the historical realized volatility. The findings show the GEPU index and its changes are consistent effective predictive factors in volatility of crude oil futures market when only individual effect is considered. Specially, GEPU change has stronger predictive power than GEPU index. Furthermore, the two-factor model with GEPU change contains more information which holds stronger forecasting ability in crude oil futures market volatility. However, GEPU cannot be an effective forecast factor when taking the influence of realized volatility into account.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[2]  
Arbatli E. C., 2017, Policy uncertainty in Japan, DOI 10.3386/w23411
[3]   Volatility spillovers between oil prices and stock sector returns: Implications for portfolio management [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Jouini, Jamel ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2011, 30 (07) :1387-1405
[4]   The Importance of the Macroeconomic Variables in Forecasting Stock Return Variance: A GARCH-MIDAS Approach [J].
Asgharian, Hossein ;
Hou, Ai Jun ;
Javed, Farrukh .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2013, 32 (07) :600-612
[5]   Volatility forecasting in commodity markets using macro uncertainty [J].
Bakas, Dimitrios ;
Triantafyllou, Athanasios .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :79-94
[6]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[7]  
Baker SR, 2013, MEASURING EC POLICY, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2198490
[8]   The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks [J].
Bloom, Nicholas .
ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (03) :623-685
[9]   Google It Up! A Google Trends-based Uncertainty index for the United States and Australia [J].
Castelnuovo, Efrem ;
Trung Duc Tran .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 161 :149-153
[10]   Volatility persistence in crude oil markets [J].
Charles, Amelie ;
Darne, Olivier .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 :729-742