Comparative effects of grain source on digestion characteristics of finishing diets for feedlot cattle: steam-flaked corn, barley, wheat, and oats

被引:10
作者
Plascencia, Alejandro [1 ]
Gonzalez-Vizcarra, Victor M. [1 ]
Zinn, Richard A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Inst Invest Ciencias Vet, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
steam-flaked; corn; grains (small); feedlot; digestion; COMPARATIVE FEEDING VALUE; RUMINAL FERMENTATION; METABOLIZABLE ENERGY; SUPPLEMENTAL FAT; PERFORMANCE; REQUIREMENTS; STARCH;
D O I
10.1139/cjas-2018-0018
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Twelve Holstein steers (454 +/- 32 kg) with cannulas in rumen and proximal duodenum were used in a generalized randomized block design to compare steam-flaked corn (SFC), barley (SFB), wheat (SFW), and oats (SFO) as grain sources (74% of diet dry matter, flake density = 0.31 kg L-1) on characteristics of digestion. Ruminal organic matter (OM) digestion was similar for SFC-, SFB-, and SFW-based diets, but lower for SFO. Ruminal microbial efficiency was greater for SFW and SFO. Given that the undegradable intake protein (UIP) value of SFC is 57%, the comparative UIP values for SFB, SFW, and SFO were 39.8%, 36.1%, and 47.3%, respectively. Ruminal starch digestion was lower for SFC than the other flaked grains. Total-tract OM digestion and digestible energy were greatest for SFC, intermediate for SFB and SFW, and lowest for SFO. Given the net energy maintenance (NEm) value of SFC is 2.40 Mcal kg(-1), the comparative NEm value for SFB, SFW, and SFO were 2.25, 2.36, and 2.17 Mcal kg(-1), respectively. Steam flaking results in important modifications of small grains that appreciably affect their comparative feeding value. Current standards underestimates the NE value of SFB, SFW, and SFO, and overestimates the UIP values for SFB and SFO.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 800
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2000, OFFICIAL METHODS ANA
[2]  
Beauchemin KA, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P1925
[3]  
BERGEN WG, 1968, J ANIM SCI, V27, P1497
[4]  
Brouwer E., 1965, PROC EEAP THIRD SYMP, P441
[5]   An alternative oven method combined with different detergent strengths in the analysis of neutral detergent fibre [J].
Chai, WH ;
Uden, P .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 74 (04) :281-288
[6]  
DEAN A, 2017, CITY, V2, P840
[7]   Effects of increasing amounts of dietary wheat on performance and ruminal fermentation of Holstein cows [J].
Doepel, L. ;
Cox, A. ;
Hayirli, A. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (08) :3825-3832
[8]   Efficiency of converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy and reevaluation of the California Net Energy System maintenance requirements and equations for predicting dietary net energy values for beef cattle [J].
Galyean, M. L. ;
Cole, N. A. ;
Tedeschi, L. O. ;
Branine, M. E. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (04) :1329-1341
[9]   Influence of carbohydrate source on ruminal fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows [J].
Gozho, G. N. ;
Mutsvangwa, T. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (07) :2726-2735
[10]   COMPARISON OF METABOLIZABLE ENERGY AND PRODUCTIVE ENERGY DETERMINATIONS WITH GROWING CHICKS [J].
HILL, FW ;
ANDERSON, DL .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1958, 64 (04) :587-603